![](https://media.kbin.social/media/ac/e2/ace232e8ab70653a97fec2fbadecb0299a7a3f7ed97e1de9d37c33328559f3b1.jpg)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/db7182d9-181a-45e1-b0aa-6768f144911a.jpeg)
You know what they’d have called him in Nazi Germany?
Herr Durr.
Fascist.
You know what they’d have called him in Nazi Germany?
Herr Durr.
Fascist.
I had this weird sensation when I watched Metropolis. I found myself thinking “ugh every trope and this is hacky as hell” then I remembered: “oh wait, this is the source of all of those things.” It made it a lot easier to appreciate.
“…Nah.”
- Capitalism
Some people drink Pepsi. Some people drink Coke. The wacky morning DJ says democracy’s a joke.
These people are never arguing in good faith.
Treating them like they are is part of their effort to self legitimize, with the side benefit of wearing out people who are acting in good faith.
“slipped past”
More like “walked through the wide open thoroughfare designed to allow them in” via deliberate underfunding of regulators and de-fanging consumer protections.
Imagine if a person did this to a bunch of individuals. What would the punishment be?
That person would likely be in prison for the rest of their lives, at least, they would be removed from society as they have proven that they cannot be trusted to participate in good faith.
How will these companies be punished?
Lol, they were biased 20 years ago when I debated.
It all depends on the local community judges are recruited from.
I lost rounds multiple times with the only note being “Global warming is a lie”
Nobody wants to judge debate tournaments except former debaters and parents forced into it by their students.
You get what you get when it comes to debate judges.
The author of the article is clearly biased themselves.
I think that one of the most difficult things to deal with more common bots, spamming, reposting, etc.
Is that parsing all the commentary and dealing with it on a service wide level is really hard to do, in terms of computing power and sheer volume of content. Seems to me that do this on an instance level with user numbers in the 10’s of thousands is a heck of a lot more reasonable than doing it on a 10’s of millions of users service.
What I’m getting at is that this really seems like something that could (maybe even should) be built into the instance moderation tools, at least some method of marking user activity as suspicious for further investigation by human admins/mods.
We’re really operating on the assumption that people spinning up instances are acting in good faith, until they prove that they aren’t, I think the first step is giving good faith actors the tools to moderate effectively, then worrying about bad faith admins.
@exscape That’s probably the wildest thing I’m finding about all of this. Reading that as the top comment, from kbin.social.
I’ll be buying a new car soon. Fuck Mazda.