I’m not so sure it’s civility politics that is limiting him here. I doubt this nakedly corrupt and partisan court would actually side with his administration when it comes to agreeing that his acts are indeed official. Especially if said acts don’t fit with the Federalist Society’s ideology.

If he doesn’t get re-elected that’s a different story, and he is realistically too old to face major consequences for his actions… so it would be great if he would at least have special forces rough these guys up a little bit to make a point about the necessary limits on executive power.

Yogi spiced blackberry

I liked the remakes of 2 and 3, and 4.

5 and 6 were fun to play co-op. I generally prefer third person games, which is why I haven’t played 7.

5 was over the top, and I like how in 6, there was a marked difference between playing as Ada, Leon vs the more action heavy Chris playthrough.

They could do another game like 6 but go harder with that concept of picking your play style.

My understanding is that immunity for official acts WOULD cover an airstrike on Trump, or a death squad assassination.

But that possibly the speech in front of the capital where he said “we’re going to go fight like hell to take our country back” is most likely NOT an official act? Maybe they could hold him accountable for that since it was NOT communication with one of his departments?

Interested in any clarification anyone can offer.

It really is that bad. Watch the videos of Biden from the Democratic convention in 2008 if anyone has any doubts.

I remember in 2015 I thought the most pathetic ballot would be Hillary Clinton vs. Jeb Bush because it would be like we lived in a hereditary monarchy. I had no idea how bad Trump was and underestimated him bigly.

Still, since we know fascism is characterized by the near worship of a strongman leader, I’m perfectly fine taking the opposite approach. If Biden is in cognitive decline, so what? As long as his administration continues to do good work, his administration gets my vote.

Removed by mod

This late in the Switch’s lifecycle, I’d argue that the existence of a new game as big as a Prime sequel is good to remind people of. Haven’t touched my Switch in a while, but will likely be picking it up again for Zelda and Prime.

They did great with Metroid Dread, putting a new spin on an old classic.

I have some faith that they won’t just be rehashing an old formula and that this “Beyond” aspect will have some gameplay twists.

This trailer seems meant to reassure those of us who have been waiting decades for a true successor to Prime that “yes, in fact this is it”.

I expect we will see more trailers as it gets closer, teasing some of the new story and gameplay innovations once they are more polished.

Microsoft is confused.

It hurt itself in it’s confusion.

Isn’t she the one that spilled those details which caused him to lose roles and sue her? I guess if she didn’t want those details public she wouldn’t have shared them right? Maybe I’m missing something.

Took a peek in worldnews recently and yeah it’s bad. I don’t remember it being so bad the last time Gaza was bombed. It’s like they cleaned out worldnews for the IPO or something.

Sold in grams for small amounts, then back to Imperial for larger amounts.

The article mentions he worked for Dean Phillips’ campaign, but it’s not clear whether he was at the time these crimes were committed.

Some of this is just because some of these frameworks and technologies have been around for a while and they iterate frequently. I see a ton of Azure content that is obsolete after only a few years.

This was my initial thought, but it’s not clear from the post whether this is a work-related rant or not. It certainly could be a rant about issues that do affect work.

I’ll layer on to the other replies which are spot on…

One reason I’ve soured on hydrogen is that it’s overall much less efficient than battery as an energy storage mechanism.

This is a really in depth article about a study that found that “well to wheel” efficiency of battery EVs was 70-80% and with hydrogen it’s 25-30%.

I was initially excited about hydrogen as energy storage for renewable sources, but battery tech has improved and is improving.

Also, one of the major advantages of a BEV for me is the ability to charge at home, possibly from energy generated by my own panels. Even if there were solutions for me to generate my own hydrogen, I’d rather lose 20-30% of that energy with a BEV than lose 70-75% with a FCEV.

Not only that, he said recently that these protests wouldn’t be happening if he was in the White House. His positions on Palestine and left-leaning protests have not exactly been subtle.

Why?

I’m not sure I’d want to be swapping my battery out like a propane tank. Not everyone would follow charging recommendations, etc.

Maybe they will save money because they don’t have to offer healthcare?