No it should not be the decision of the parents, it should be the decision of the patient and their doctors.

stop usibg [sic] ur brain and thinking for yourself

You don’t need to tell them to do that, they clearly already did before commenting. But then, so did you.

Holy shit you have absolutely no idea what the fuck you’re talking about, so please shut the fuck up about your uninformed personal opinions.

Puberty blockers only delay the onset of puberty until you stop taking them, at which point development resumes normally with far less downsides than the risk of developing undesired sex characteristics. So no, this is not “the same choice no matter if we ban or allow this.” The same choice would be starting actual sex hormones; puberty blockers are the middle ground here.

Banning puberty blockers is politically motivated actors putting their politics above people’s bodily autonomy and medical professionals’ ability to make medically informed decisions.

You’re flat out wrong that allowing doctors to prescribe puberty blockers would cause risk of greater suffering in such a way as to make it abundantly clear that you don’t know what those meds actually do.

You are a fucking moron. Username checks out.

How is this a LAMF? Didn’t Uncommitted say that as much as the Democrats suck, people should still vote for them over Trump?

Yeah we’re proper fucked tbh

In that case yeah, I guess it is a vehicle.

Didn’t they start shoving AI bullshit into it? Kinda undermines the point.

Sure, but quite often in EMUs the cars come in sets that can’t operate disconnected from each other, so I’d argue that they still comprise a single vehicle.

I’d argue that the ISS, due to lacking means of propulsion (unless you count explosive decompression) is not a vehicle.

Guter Pfosten, Alter.

“World’s largest EV”

Blatantly untrue. Larger EVs have been in use for more than a century at this point in the form of EMU trains.

splat “I am a steg-o-saurus!”

What protections? Give me some concrete examples of what you’re talking about here.

That’s a terrible example. Gendered bathrooms would still fulfil their function if anybody could use them regardless of gender, causing no measurable harm to anyone.

Assuming good faith on the part of those involved, I don’t see how inclusivity comes at the cost of effectiveness. Would you care to elaborate?

Sure, the anatomical features we use to categorise people into genders have always existed, but the categories themselves are made up and there’s a rather large amount of overlap between them. The more strictly someone attempts to enforce a given set of criteria as the basis for this categorisation, the less practical utility their definition tends to have in terms of everyday use.

Simple, right up until you actually try to enact such a scheme, at which point its logistical infeasibility drives you to liquidating large subsets of the population instead.

It’s called the final solution because it wasn’t exactly plan A.

Ikr right? “fewer stories like this” bitch please, how about I get no more of this shit instead???

Oh come on, I doubt it’s that large.

Helpful guide for anyone reading this thread who’s still unsure:

Doxxing people as a general rule is bad. Doxxing actual fucking nazis specifically is a public service (cool and good).

If Russia wants peace they can simply put an end to their occupation of Ukrainian land 🤷‍♀️