Someone make a “grand moth tarkin” meme for me, please. I’m too lazy.
- 3 Posts
- 513 Comments
Yes yes, Jesus was Jewish, no need to belabor the point
(It’s okay, folks, I’m Jewish so this joke is certified kosher)
neatchee@lemmy.worldto News@lemmy.world•Republicans Prepare Bill Declaring “Free Palestine” Is Antisemitic2·20 days agoAh yeah, didn’t read that way haha. Thanks for clarifying 💙
neatchee@lemmy.worldto News@lemmy.world•Republicans Prepare Bill Declaring “Free Palestine” Is Antisemitic2·20 days agoThat is for sure. There is no question that it is an asinine attempt by the GOP to weaponize the law, rather than a genuine attempt at protecting Jews in any way, shape or form
neatchee@lemmy.worldto News@lemmy.world•Republicans Prepare Bill Declaring “Free Palestine” Is Antisemitic4·20 days agoNot be contrarian, but this is a common misconception. Hate speech IS protected speech in the US, but it can be used to enhance the punishment of a related crime into a hate crime.
It can also, under specific circumstances, be considered “fighting words”. But again, that depends on the specific context and is not broadly true.
This is one of my least favorite facts, but it is unfortunately true
neatchee@lemmy.worldto News@lemmy.world•Republicans Prepare Bill Declaring “Free Palestine” Is Antisemitic181·20 days agoAnd when you see someone conflating all Jews with the Israeli government, you are free, nay encouraged, to call that shit out.
But guess what’s NOT happening in this thread? Or this entire comment section?
Israel is committing genocide.
Sincerely, your friendly neighborhood Jew
And that’s how you know you’re in the forkin’ Good Place
Wouldn’t the legpit be the pocket created at your hip when your leg is folded against your body?
neatchee@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•The technology to end traffic deaths exists. Why aren’t we using it?English2·1 month agoThis is misleading and dangerous rhetoric.
Autonomous vehicles - actual autonomous ones, not Tesla bullshit marketing “self-driving” - are already significantly safer than human drivers. Yes, they are limited to certain conditions (they don’t handle inclement weather very well yet) but the point is that they are already improving safety over human drivers.
Don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good.
Additionally, once autonomous vehicles become the standard, you will see a dramatic shift in how the insurance industry operates.
Think about it: if I’m not the one driving, why would I be the one taking on liability? I wouldn’t. The manufacturer would. Suddenly, the insurance industry would be targeting vehicle/software producers instead of individuals. And anyone who chooses to drive themselves anyway? They would almost always be liable by default. Premiums for drivers would skyrocket and this would be a huge disincentive to getting behind the wheel in the first place.
Don’t. Let. The. Perfect. Be. The. Enemy. Of. The. Good.
We all lose out. And it costs lives.
I said I would show why it’s patently absurd. And I did. Absurdity comes in many forms, including systemic issues that require dramatic change
What’s your point? Cool story, still raped two women. Don’t put violent sex offenders with the demographic they victimized. Should lesbian sex offenders be incarcerated with other women? Probably not, right?
You’ve just made a great argument for why gendered prisons are a ridiculous notion in the first place, and why results-based decision making is more important than broad, impersonal classification-based decision making.
And that’s before we even talk about how the overwhelming majority of prisons in general are inhumane and ineffective at reducing crime.
Yup. Pretty much.
Let me turn that around on you:
Should a male-presenting, gay sex offender go to a male prison or female prison? What is the purpose of gendered prisons? What problem is it trying to solve? And why are we using gender for that instead of “likely victims of the incarcerated individual”?
Gendered prisons are a ridiculous notion that only exist because our prison system itself is completely fucked up, profit-driven, and inhumane. It produces worse outcomes than almost any other form of legal consequences except in extreme cases.
Yes. Or treat trans women as women. Because that’s what they are. Name a situation where you think this would be problematic and I’ll show you why it’s patently absurd.
neatchee@lemmy.worldto Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•Watching "They Live!" has opened my eyes to how often the movie is referenced, as if I put on the same sunglasses311·2 months agoFun fact: the infamous “cripple fight” from South Park is a shot-for-shot remake of the fight scene from They Live
While this is good advice, best practice is to always get your yubikey in pairs and keep them synchronized. One should remain in your home, in a safe place (as you described) while the other should remain on your person or outside the home (e.g. in a safe deposit box)
It’s more of a pain in the ass for sure, but handles the theft scenario more effectively
neatchee@lemmy.worldto You Should Know@lemmy.world•YSK: Mint Press News is Russian propaganda2·2 months ago😍🤩 Contextually relevant Depeche Mode 🤩😍
neatchee@lemmy.worldto You Should Know@lemmy.world•YSK: Mint Press News is Russian propaganda134·2 months agoI was wondering wtf you were talking about until I remembered I have the entire tankiesphere blocked. Oh the blissful, golden silence 😁
Did I fall asleep?
Imagine a vampire getting frustrated with a realtor because this is the fourth time they’ve arrived at a house they’re interested in to do a walkthrough but the owners aren’t home and the realtor, as someone who doesn’t have ties to the memories created in that home, can’t invite him in.
This also has fascinating implications for house flippers. If you only live there while working on it, have you not amassed enough “home power” to keep vampires out? Does the power of your previous home follow you to a new address if it’s mostly the same decor?