You won the internet, my friend!
Big time
The study calls for a reevaluation of the breadwinner ideology, highlighting the need to understand and support American men’s diverse and often precarious employment experiences.
Neat, the article and the study even talks about it
The study calls for a reevaluation of the breadwinner ideology, highlighting the need to understand and support American men’s diverse and often precarious employment experiences.
Hell, the article’s conclusion is about economic instability being a bad thing? >
The economic theory that brought us the post war boom is Keynesian Economics, not Free Market Capitalism
Not to mention, we seen this play out historically in the US.
Inflation didn’t really affect Nixon or Reagan reelection, what mattered was the wars and jobs
When Volkner jacked up rates during Carter, it cause a massive spike in unemployment which is the main reason why Carter lost reelection
I thought this is valuable because we seen Dems picking up seats despite the high inflation and this might provide the reasoning behind it
I thought this is valuable because we seen Dems picking up seats despite the high inflation and this might provide the reasoning behind it
TBF Carmel actually does a lot of neat stuff, while other cities is just cUT tAxEs
James Brainard, the current mayor, is probably going to vote Democrat this time around, because Moms of Liberty are 100% against all of this policies despite him being a republican
I think it is hilarious because Elon says he is and this other group is calling him out on it
Elon Musk, while destroying Twitter, is still a massive advocate of abusing employees (https://gizmodo.com/twitter-elon-musk-silicon-valley-tech-layoffs-1850470520) and very much against the strikes (https://finance.yahoo.com/news/elon-musk-says-auto-union-201310505.html)
It’s nice seeing Elon being called out on his anti worker shit, considering the lack of blowback on this
https://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/elon-musk-biden-uaw-strikers
You are right
It does mandate 2 days out of a pay period, the bill does suck
What is interesting, is while the MAGA wants full RTO and Biden via Executive Order is also trying to push full RTO (just ask the EPA staff). The Senate has this bill pushing for some not full RTO. I don’t support this bill, but I can’t help but wonder if the Senate is admitting some weakness here
Broader context is Biden is trying to force RTO on all federal workers
Which make this bill a shock
You are absolutely correct
A major problem my friends who work for gov is that Biden been trying to push RTO, even as his own agency heads work from home, so I must have missed the poison pill when I read this article
https://www.axios.com/2023/10/20/biden-agency-head-works-remote-missouri-dc
This legislation emerges on the heels of efforts by senators like “Family-Friendly” Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) to undo remote work, which makes it easier for workers to start and grow families, guidelines established during the pandemic.
I thought the article was just mocking right wingers
Edit:
It does mock right wingers, and I read the bill it doesn’t look like it has a poison pill besides the potentially harmful twice in a pay period (which is two weeks)
Remote work has been a target of self styled “pro-family” conservatives. For instance, Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) voiced worries about federal employees moving to less expensive areas but retaining high pay (The absolute horror!). These arguments contribute to a larger political discourse on the pros and cons of family-friendly remote work.
Yes,
Doesn’t stop capitalists from being greedy stupid gits