• psud@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would almost* like to see that litigated again. Last time the argument was “people have had to travel to their workplace before starting since time immemorial, so no change now”

    But now that for many jobs the work location is arbitrary that argument wont be so easy.

    *“Almost” since the money would still be on the other side

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wish we didn’t need these things to go to court for them to change, but it would require an extremely progressive government in power for that to happen in any country…

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That’s what I meant, why should we need to go to court to get that right recognized when it should be the government changing the law without court intervention?