Meta just announced that they are trying to integrate Threads with ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, etc.). We need to defederate them if we want to avoid them pushing their crap into fediverse.

If you’re a server admin, please defederate Meta’s domain “threads.net

If you don’t run your own server, please ask your server admin to defederate “threads.net”.

    • Mario_Dies.wav@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t believe the people saying “just wait and see” are genuine users. I have a hard time fathoming that after Meta’s atrocious history, as well as the history of what happens when large corporations get involved – I simply can’t believe these are more than paid shill accounts.

      Or maybe I’m the one who’s naive, thinking that people can’t possibly be so foolish…

    • Corgana@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’d be a moron to trust them obv, but how would Threads using ActivityPub extingush the Fediverse?

        • Black616Angel@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Embrace, Extend, Extinguish

          1. Embrace:

          They implement ActivityPub and connect to all the available servers. A load of new users will see the content here and all the communities here will be absolutely flooded with new content and users.

          2. Extend:

          ActivityPub will be extended. Many new features will be added, that don’t really match the standard, but they are mostly useful so some developers will try to add them to let’s say Lemmy. They won’t be blr to develop new features on their own and some stuff with threads will always be broken or half baked. Threads users will belittle the users here, some will maybe go there, cause it just works and is otherwise the same.
          New users at the same time will most likely go directly to threads cause it’s backed by a giant company, always works and has more features.

          3. Extinguish:

          They will cut the federation.
          Communities here will feel empty and most users will just leave. Only the hard core will stay and that won’t be sustainable. The fediverse becomes even less attractive for new users and will devolve into a niche community.

        • squiblet@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          Throw 50 fulltime programmers at development and crowd everyone else out. Or fork it with something clearly superior since they can afford to pay people to work on it fulltime.

        • Corgana@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Right, I’ve also yet to see what defederating from a hypthetical Threads instance could prevent.

      • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Especially given that Meta needs federation to comply with the Digital Markets Act.

    • Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re a really good open source contributor with a great track record, I know people don’t like saying good stuff about zuck related things but they’ve helped progress machine learning quite a bit. Pytourch is a great example iirc used in stable diffusion

    • PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      DECADES long? Facebook didn’t even exist 2 decades ago bud. We know they’re shit but you don’t need to go around exaggerating everything and being so dramatic.