President Biden expressed the US’s ‘ironclad commitment to NATO’

  • rambaroo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yet you’re here talking about her. She’s an actual traitor in a position of power. But sure she’s irrelevant.

    • Rhoeri@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      So, please…. Explain to me what makes her relevant. And remember- relevant ≠ popular.

      The floor is yours.

      • rambaroo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Popularity is relevance in a democracy. She has influence over millions of people. She’s an elected federal official who sits on a bunch of committees in Congress. Her shitty opinions on things like the debt ceiling helped bring us to the brink of a financial crisis. How is that not relevant?

        • Rhoeri@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          So I’m not allowed d to have the opinion that’s she’s irrelevant? She HAS to be relevant to me?

          Cool.

          Hey, if you don’t mind, I’m going to check with you from now on when it comes to these things since you speak directly for me on these matters.

          • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            So much hate… They are saying that she is relevant, you are saying that she isn’t without providing any proof then shielding your statement as an opinion after posting it.

            Come on

              • zefiax@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Not everything is an opinion. I don’t know why people now days think they can argue anything by claiming it’s their opinion. She has more power and influence than the vast vast majority of Americans. Whether you want her to be relevant or not does not change the reality that she is relevant.

                  • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Well, then edit your original comment because you are changing your tone real fast after being challenged. You know that you were stating that as a fact, and that you decided to call it an opinion when being challenged with facts.

                    Come on, we are adults here, it’s obvious.

        • Rhoeri@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          So I’m not allowed d to have the opinion that’s she’s irrelevant? She HAS to be relevant to me?

          Cool.

          Hey, if you don’t mind, I’m going to check with you from now on when it comes to these things since you speak directly for me on these matters.

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Hey man what you’re missing is that “relevancy” for elected leaders is objective. Her votes and committee positions do, in fact, objectively matter regardless of how much you or I personally disregard her.

            You’re having an argument based around a misnterpretation of that concept