• TAG@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    They have a perfectly good explanation in the first paragraph of the article:

    it has fans wondering if a Nintendo Selects-style repackaging of these titles

    • atocci@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      What’s the point of those sorts of re-releases? Are the contents any different from the game that was on store shelves previously?

      • Peekystar@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        Nope; pretty sure that the Nintendo Selects are just discounted physical releases with a fancy border on their front-facing box art, historically done for some of the best-selling titles on the given console (thus far seen on the Wii, 3DS and Wii U).

        • picandocodigo@lemmy.worldOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          And they did this before with “Player’s Choice” on SNES, Game Boy, Nintendo 64, Game Cube and Game Boy Advance.

      • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        It’s to show case best sellers. Same reason the PS1 did it, and every console since. Also the same reason books have editions that say bestseller on them.

      • MarkV@mastodon.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        @atocci @picandocodigo @TAG I’d also add that Nintendo has a history / policy of never reducing the price of a game. So if Zelda is $59 at release, it will still be $59 three years later. This avoids people “waiting a year” for the price to drop - if you want the game, you might as well buy it at launch (unless you want to buy it second hand).

        • Kiosade@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Not really true, they discount their games on the eshop all the time. And if you’re talking physical copies, Target and other stores have sales all the time too. It’s just not as good as Ubisoft lowering the price of their games to $20 after a month or whatever, so people bitch and moan.

          • MarkV@mastodon.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            @Kiosade Both true and fair exceptions, just pointing out their general trend. Wasn’t trying to either bitch or moan 😅

            The way I see it, they re-release games that continue selling well 3-4 years after the initial release at a lower price point so they can continue getting revenue from them without losing out to the 2nd hand market. I think many of their games continue selling much longer than typical AAA games.

            • Kiosade@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Oh sorry, I wasn’t trying to say you were doing that, it’s just a thing I see quite often whenever this topic comes up.

              And yeah, their games are generally pretty good, so they have staying power. This is compared to flavor of the month games where, once the general populace has had their fun with them, they die in a far-off corner, never to be heard of again.

      • PrettyLights@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Back in the day of PS2 I remember the greatest hits copies used black and white manuals instead of color copies.

        Now that manuals are gone I’m not sure how much different they’d be. Maybe including some DLC similar to a GOTY edition.

    • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’ve been saying for a long time that Nintendo clearly buys back and destroys unsold first party stock. That’s why you can go search for a first party GameCube game and you’ll be paying out the ass for a used copy. I guess it’s their way of keeping their games popular and not have unopened copies all over the place

      • TAG@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        That is a very bold assertion.

        I just assume that the Nintendo first party games tend to sell well and sell for a long time, so when they stop getting manufactured, they all sell out and still have a bit of demand left that scoops up used copies. They are not making Madden or Call of Duty, which sell well for a year and then everyone is looking to sell last year’s version.

      • PrettyLights@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        The GameCube really didn’t sell that well. They produced less stock overall, thus less supply compared with other systems like PS2.

        When comparing with the ps2 specifically, it gets even more skewed as new ps2 games were still being made and released years after the ps3 came out. Not just new copies, but entirely new games.