• SzethFriendOfNimi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    CNN: We can’t ask if you want to allow cookies because you’re blocking everything

    Me: Which means I don’t want you to……….?

    CNN: No idea, we have to ask you.

    Me: I’m so strict you can’t even ask meaning………?

    CNN: You….

    Me: Yes?

    CNN: Uh………… don’t want……

    Me: Yesssss………

    CNN: To miss out on us asking you.

      • TheEntity@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        GDPR doesn’t require them to ask if they would just not violate our privacy. In other words, it’s perfectly legal to assume “no” if they have no means of asking.

        • sanpo@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          10 months ago

          It’s not only legal to assume, it’s a requirement to default to “no”.
          Tracking is opt-in.

      • FishFace@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        The requirement to not track users with cookies does not extend to cookies that make the site work in the first place, such as those which track your login session, or your refusal of other cookies.

        • Delta_V@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          so don’t track login sessions, etc.

          no cookies, no problem with not having asked for cookie consent.

          if the site breaks, it breaks, and leaving it broken is a choice users can make.