• aesthelete@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    Except it isn’t a restaurant, it’s control of government, and a basic understanding of the rules of voting in the country shows that there are only two choices that have a reasonable chance of winning.

    • LesserAbe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      And? If you want people to vote for the candidate you support, you have to convince them to do it!

      • aesthelete@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Yeah which takes ads, which require donations, and that is why politicians basically have to sell out in order to get votes.

        EDIT: Everyone is right. The way the world works is that the Democratic candidate has to be a vaulted saint who single-handedly sheds decades old international alliances and ends all war and famine, is immune from money concerns, and disseminates his message via telepathy because traditional donations are beneath a being of his type…and he must be able to fully defeat a Republican demagogue who takes money from anyone, has the full support of Russia, and whose every utterance is covered in the press in addition to being a de-facto cult leader with a warchest of millions or even billions of dollars to be able to do traditional ad buys as well.

        Completely reasonable 🙄