• Whirlybird@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    The law specifically puts “gender identity” as a protected class for this legislation. Why do you think that is?

      • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Now put that together with the context of these hate speech law changes and you see what that means?

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It means they’re protected by the law. Not this sky-is-falling nonsense from one guy whose job it is to scream sky-is-falling nonsense.

          • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Right, so the changes they made to the law mean that someone can be charged for misgendering…….which is the point that you guys are saying isn’t true.

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Right, so the changes they made to the law mean that someone can be charged for misgendering…

              According to one guy who is deliberately misinterpreting the law because he’s a bigoted alarmist who doesn’t want trans people having any legal protections at all. You keep ignoring this.

              • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m sure you don’t even see the irony in saying that’s just one persons opinion of it, like a random staunch democrat voters opinion isn’t biased in one direction.

                What you mean to say is that you disagree and think the law won’t be enforced that way. The law makes it possible to enforce misgendering as hate speech.