• Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 months ago

    The speaker of the house is mad that he wasn’t involved in senate business? Sounds like a fucking excuse to me.

    • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      The speaker doesn’t have to be involved in all things. They aren’t on every committee.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yes, the speaker of the house really shouldn’t be involved in senate business. That’s what I was saying. It was a bullshit excuse on the speaker’s part.

      • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        The Speaker typically has major sway over the budget even though they aren’t on the Ways and Means Committee.

        That said, it is usually tradition for the Senate to come up with the compromise when the House and President are at odds and can’t negotiate their own deal.

    • Billiam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I imagine that during bipartisan Senate negotiations it’d be prudent and/or courteous to include the House leadership as well, to avoid this exact kind of embarrassment.