When Al-Qaeda themselves claimed responsibility, even with overwhelming evidence aside? Why were so many people still reluctant, I was researching about this stuff and was shocked to see people who I respect a lot believe in this

  • blazera@kbin.social
    151·
    9 months ago

    and the collapse of building 7 occurred exactly as you would expect from a building fire

    It wasnt the first skyscraper fire, but it was the first and still only skyscraper to collapse from a fire. So no i wouldnt say its expected at all.

      • blazera@kbin.social
        6·
        9 months ago

        Even if you ask them

        “The collapse of WTC 7 is the first known instance of a tall building brought down primarily by uncontrolled fires. The fires in WTC 7 were similar to those that have occurred in several tall buildings where the automatic sprinklers did not function or were not present.”

        • phillaholic@lemm.ee
          21·
          9 months ago

          There’s a first for everything. And after reading the report, it’s easy to come to the conclusion that a building under those conditions would be expected to fail.

          • blazera@kbin.social
            32·
            9 months ago

            like a first for govenment coverup of a building demolition disguised as a terror attack?

            • phillaholic@lemm.ee
              31·
              9 months ago

              Could have been, but it wasn’t. It’s utterly absurd to think it was logistically possible to do so without anyone seeing or leaking anything. That plot wouldn’t make it out of 9th grade creative writing class.