• Mac@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    Please tell me your plan to collect all of the people spread across half of a state who commute to a central location.

    Mobility enables poor people. Not all poor people live in an idealistic 15-minute city.

    • mondoman712@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I don’t think rural living makes sense if you’re also commuting. Small towns can have good transport links to other nearby towns but I don’t think it makes sense to support those who decide they want to live beyond the practical reach of public services just for the sake of it.

      • Mac@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I understand that you’re doing a thought experiment about futuristic utopias but I am talking about the current situation right now and a comment that started this chain.

        People live in rural areas whether you think they should or not and raising gas prices to reduce car travel disproportionately affects those people.

        Now, if there was some way for poor people to get fuel credits or something so that they’re empowered with mobility maybe that would work.

        We also should probably not make farming any harder than it already is.

        • mondoman712@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          9 months ago

          It’s not a utopia, it’s perfectly possible if we work towards it.

          And I said

          live beyond the practical reach of public services just for the sake of it.

          Specifically to exclude farmers

    • ComplexLotus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      In 2020 according to statistics 82.66% of all americans lived in cities, not spread across half the state. Urban areas and country side should be developed differently of course.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      There are other places in the world who do this much better than the US. How about instead of assuming it’s impossible because you haven’t seen it you consider that it is, in fact, possible but the image has been designed to make it appear impossible by those benefiting from it not being done.

      Also, choosing to live away from work is a choice. Suburbia is a choice, and actually one that costs more money in taxes than it makes over time, requiring it to continue to expand or admit it doesn’t work. You can choose to live closer, or even choose to bike to a bus stop/train station/whatever that is positioned reasonably if things weren’t designed around making car and gas company executives rich.

      • Mac@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Suburbia? Thanks for showing you have no idea what I’m talking about.

    • SinJab0n@mujico.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Mobility enables poor people

      True

      Not all poor people live in an idealistic 15-minute city

      Dude, i live in the fucking state of mexico, we don’t even have rail. And even when we touch the city it’s at least half an hour to get to the city center of Mexico city.

      And yet, u know what makes it possible for me to come work every day to the city? Public transport.

      So yeah, fuck that idea about how it wouldn’t work, put some buses to work out there and even the traffic problem will be lessened since there will be less cars on the road, not to mention how it should be even cheaper since the cost of transportation its gonna be equally split in a bigger ammount of passengers.