The movie came out in 1999. In the movie, they state that it’s 1999 (in the Matrix anyway). Neo is pretty tech savvy and a renowned hacker.
My assumption is he would’ve used FreeBSD. Or, maybe, Slackware. But I’m leaning more towards BSD.
Nah. It is DOS with Norton Commander.
I just can’t believe I just read the words Norton Commander.
It’s like the Proust story where he smells a macaroon and all of a sudden he’s remembering an avalanche of things long forgotten.
My brain defragging
Dos Navigator
Bwahahahahah
Man I wish FreeBSD hadn’t fallen to the wayside. It’s really cohesive and feels put together in a way not Linux distro ever has.
Except it uses push over licensing
That’s a GPL point of view. Most BSD users I’ve talked to prefer a more permissive license. Theo said: “GPL fans said the great problem we would face is that companies would take our BSD code, modify it, and not give back. Nope – the great problem we face is that people would wrap the GPL around our code, and lock us out in the same way that these supposed companies would lock us out. Just like the Linux community, we have many companies giving us code back, all the time. But once the code is GPL’d, we cannot get it back. Ironic.”
i guess this might be why a lot of processing and storage clusters use it behind closed doors with proprietary code we will never see.
Which is fine with for example OpenBSD, they write “ISC or Berkeley style licences are preferred, the GPL is not acceptable when adding new code, NDAs are never acceptable. We want to make available source code that anyone can use for ANY PURPOSE, with no restrictions. We strive to make our software robust and secure, and encourage companies to use whichever pieces they want to.”
And where system is doing better, Linux or BSD? Also the point of the GPL is not to give back. You can have GPL code that is read only and it doesn’t hurt a thing. The point is you can get the code running on your computer and freely make changes to it.
Doing better in what way? Number of installs or being robust and secure? If we go by numbers one could argue that Windows is doing best on the desktop, and that proprietary code therefore is something to strive for. Either way it’s a tangent of the original statement, that the BSD license is a “pushover” license, which I oppose, because the BSD devs are deliberately allowing their code to be used by anyone for any reason.
Is it still worth using? Say, for a web dev? Or is it less supported?
It’s usually used for storage servers these days. ZFS is most stable there.
Ix (Truenas) is transitioning to linux though.
Honestly it isn’t. Support for anything front-end related is way more sparse compared to Linux.
That’s a shame. I’d love a new exotic OS to try.
I don’t think I’ve ever heard FreeBSD described as either “new” or “exotic”
New and exotic to me.
I’ll give you “new” but it’s about as far from exotic as you can get… Not a bad thing, BTW, and I highly recommend giving it a try, it’s an excellent system, though probably better for a server than a workstation/desktop (though it definitely can be a very good workstation/desktop if you like)
Its Ports system is the inspiration for Gentoo’s Portage, BTW
“hello system” is pretty nice to look at, and has some Mac-isms I find helpful. FreeBSD has a new release recently, so maybe Nomad or GhostBSD could be worth trying. You’ll find FreeBSD is a lot more “consistent” compared to Linux, but be prepared for random hardware to not work.
You know, I’ve never used it. Maybe I’ll install it in a VM tonight and give it a whirl.
I mean, it’s decades older with a history of being used in business critical applications…
In 1999, I bet he was running Gentoo.
The first release was in 2002.
deleted by creator
Definitely Gentoo
I’d argue that he’d use OpenBSD and be running his own firewall, web server, email server, and ftp server.
Or SuSE Linux, the non-slackware or jurix version was bleeding edge at the time.
PC-BSD
Maybe both? BSD for his server, Slackware for his desktop. Or something.
Remember he presses Ctrl+x to try to get rid of the message on his screen. That’s Unix, right?
Realistically, Debian, because it existed when the movie was set.
Removed by mod
Other distros exist to teach people that Debian is better.
We had tons of Linux distros then. Maybe more than today if you exclude all the Debian clones
Hannah Montana Linux
This, but maybe slackware with the hannah montana ui.
no sane hacker would choose slackware over hannah montana
KDE NEOn
Real image from the really official archived film 👍 👍Slackware.
Well, since the movies where one big trans allegory, the answer can only be Arch.
Wut
I am not a big Matrix fan, so maybe my knowledge about the films (I saw 1 and 2, both only once) might be too limited. But I completely fail to understand the symbology.
From what I can remember, the simbolism is stronger in the first movie and not so much on the other two. I recall two key things that can simbolize the struggle trans people go through or are references to transgenderism.
- Neo feels that there is something wrong with the world and that he does not belong in it
- The Character Switch was originally supposed to be a man in the real world and a woman when plugged in to the matrix.
I’m sure there’s more but it’s been a while since I came across the analysis.
Worth noting that when I watched the movies I never made an association with transgenderism. I think in great part because I was not even aware of it.
The Character Switch was originally supposed to be a man in the real world and a woman when plugged in to the matrix.
This would have been a clear symbol.
A bit subtle, especially if you weren’t familiar with medicines at the time, but the blue pill is supposed to represent an antidepressant (Prozac was apparently blue at that time, don’t know about now, and was commonly prescribed to closeted trans women instead of actually addressing the core issue), and the red pill HRT (one of the common hormone pills at the time was red)
Which makes the “redpill” movement extra hilarious.
As said, though, it was really subtle if you knew that and completely opaque if you didn’t
Page doesnt load
How about this link
Thanks. That loads but it doesn’t explain how the film is an allegory for transgender. I’d love to read an analysis of the film that breaks down what scenes mean what through that lens
I see. I watched some video on it a ong time ago so I don’t recall the details. I’m sure you can find something.
With a lot of shots, scenery, and concepts stolen right from the movie Dark City.
I have to rewatch that gem…
I wanna know what the newsreader he uses is
Looks a bit like the Arachne browser for DOS.
These icons don’t make no sense.
I don’t know the distro, but surely the messenger is based on Matrix protocol
I don’t know but he probably has cmatrix installed.
I think we all know the real answer, the matrix runs on windows XP
There is no distro.
Yeah he doesn’t distribute it due to privacy and security. He wrote it himself.
Do not try and hack the distro, that’s impossible.
Instead, only try to realize the truth: there is no distro.
Then you will realize it isn’t the distro you hack, it is only yourself.
OpenBSD
He is Assembly, Operating Systems require him to operate.
Kali
Initial Release: 2013-03-13
Neo lived in 1999.
In a simulation 1999.
It would have been
BackTrackKnoppix back then. And even that wasn’t released until 2000.
