• Ferrous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    43
    ·
    6 months ago

    The only logical conclusion to that line of thinking is, 30 years from now, voting for the candidate who supports 5 genocides as opposed to the candidate who supports 10 genocides. It is a liberal and fascistic strategy. Any vote within the American electoral system, which is kabuki theater, does nothing other than to refine capitalism and the regime.

    • jumjummy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      I love how unhinged your argument is, essentially boiling down to “Voting is a waste”. Get out of here with that noise. You “both sides are the same” fools are just foreign disinformation agents, or useful idiots.

      Lemmy is absolutely infested with this nonsense.

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’ve seen it a lot, yeah. I’m proud of how well Lemmy has pushed back on it.

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          We’re not doing good enough. There’s still a LOT of threads where the “both sides, don’t vote” propaganda has taken over.

    • Signtist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      Bud, what? We need a revolution, yes, but it takes time to build it up - we’re not going to overthrow the government tomorrow. So, what do we do while we’re building up that support? Keep the country stitched up with the knock-off duct tape that is the democrats. Yes, the entire thing is coming apart at the seams, and pieces are falling off, but it’s better than letting people actively break it further. There will be no revolution if there’s nobody left to rise up.

      • Pan_Ziemniak@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Not only this, but our populace keeps shifting socially leftward. Hence why we have legalized gay marriage and why trans rights are even able to be discussed openly. The dems have been forced to shift their stances from the 90s on these issues bc of their core demographic shifting to the left.

        Take note that lgbt rights, privacy, universal healthcare, and sensible climate change policies are no longer fringe, they are at the forefront of what the youth wants. Dont believe the lie that things will only get worse from here if we compromise on status quo joe.

        The country is changing whether we like it or not. Either the leftward trend of the majority continues and those who wish to be elected fall in line, or we vote for the biggest boot youll ever see in ur lifetime.

        • Jentu@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Social acceptance of queer people is falling. Maybe if we’re talking about the prospects of revolution, we shouldn’t wait until social acceptance of queer people is so low that no one wants to work with us to make necessary change. I’m not saying revolution has to happen before this upcoming election since numbers aren’t changing that much (even though falling acceptance is always scary), but “society will generally move leftward” isn’t something that should be trusted or expected.

          From a study of 22,000 adults published march of 2024:

          Support for non-discrimination protections for LGBTQ Americans has dropped four points in the past year, from 80% in 2022 to 76% in 2023.

          Even young Americans, aged 18-29, show a gradual decrease in support for LGBTQ nondiscrimination laws over the last three years, declining from a peak of 83% in 2020 to 75% in 2023.

          Support for same-sex marriage has declined among Americans in the last year, dropping from 69% to 67%.

          • Pan_Ziemniak@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Call it speculation, but those are minor dips on the whole- any upward trend will come with temporary dips. The strides weve made in queer acceptance since, say, the mid 2000s, are staggering. The dips we notice come as the queer acceptance and gender equality movements have expanded to include fighting for trans folk, as well. We werent capable of even discussing trans rights up until recently, now it is a hot button issue.

            Meanwhile, the average conservative is not the donald trump monster a lot of us are continuously made to believe in by the media we consume. The conservatives i work with on the daily are very quick to point out that they are accepting of gay ppl under far less conditions than they were even 10 years ago. As in, im not talking about, “not that theres anything wrong with that,” but outright, “such and such coworker whom i hold in high esteem is/was gay,” and then pretending that they were never part of the antigay crowd in the before times in the first place. The overall cultural shift in this country over the past 20 years has been astounding to see. I will grant that those same individuals might still have reservations towards gay adoption, but they do not feel like that is a safe thing to openly talk about.

        • Signtist@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          6 months ago

          I hope you’re right, but I honestly see our current political options as being the government’s response to our own successful pulls toward the left. “You want to force our Dems to support ever more left-leaning ideals? Well, we’ll just push our Conservatives ever further to the right, so you feel compelled to vote even for a moderate democrat to prevent them from getting power!” The government has just as much ability to force our hand as we do on it - or, more likely, even moreso. I believe this election is an example of that.

          • Pan_Ziemniak@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            6 months ago

            Mmm, despite what the FUD crowd here on lemmy would have u believe, the dems are not so keen on donnie dump and co. as their adversaries. They want to retain power, too. Dr. Fascismo is a massive threat to that end. On the flip side, biden and the rest of the old guard care little if we want lgbtq rights to be engrained in law, support abortion outright bc they want women to be happy spenders of money, and see climate accountability as a threat to their lobbyist friends only at the far end of that spectrum- otherwise they will vote to placate.

            Obviously far leftist politics can only come via direct action, but even then democrats are a smaller boot to deal with and should be embraced as the enemy of our enemy.

            • Signtist@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              6 months ago

              I think there’s a lot more comradery between politicians across the aisle than they let on publicly. I agree with the final statement, though “embraced” is a far stronger word than I’d pick.

              • Pan_Ziemniak@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                6 months ago

                I once would have agreed with u, but ithink that comradery has been tainted ever since trumps coattails brought on crazies like greene, boebert, and their ilk. They have no regard for politics as any of the old guard know it. Instead they seek to push russia friendly legislation exclusively. Thats not something any of even the corporate dems can get behind.

                I chose “embraced” precisely bc it is a strong word. Ive been having a grand old time building the sort of bridges with liberals that leftists have been telling me for a long time are impossible to make. The working class needs to again feel the leftist arm extended to them. They may not want to get involved in direct action, but they are willing recipients of leftist politics when they are presented before them in a friendly manner.

                • Signtist@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  I mean, I don’t often see a democratic voter who doesn’t want to vote for a much farther left candidate - the issue is whether or not we’ll be able to vote for one outside of voting 3rd party, which isn’t an option that’s going to be seen as legitimate any time soon. In the primaries, a majority of people just vote for the guy from their party who they think has the best chance of winning, which is pretty much always the one who got the most media attention.

                  I don’t believe the American people wanted Biden to be the democratic candidate of 2020, I believe he was the guy the news companies focused on, and so blue voters voted for him because they thought everyone else was voting for him, wanting to band together against Trump. I hope the issue was Trump himself, and that once he’s not running for president anymore we won’t feel so forced to pick “whoever will win,” but I don’t really have any faith that some Trump-esque candidate won’t just rise up to replace him for the next election.

      • Ferrous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        6 months ago

        You say “build it up”, but what you really mean is “achieve revolution via electoralism” - which has no historical basis. This is liberalism.

        • Signtist@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          6 months ago

          No, I mean literally get the people on board with the idea of having a second American revolution. With guns and everything.

        • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          It’s been achieved several times, and I’m sure you’ll remember it the instant you have an opportunity to talk about this or that elected socialist which the CIA had a hand in deposing.

          From a historical basis, it’s almost more important that countries like America achieve revolution through electoralism, because it would the revolution direct oversight to abolish and reform the machinery that has been used to reverse electoral revolution elsewhere in the world.

          Especially with how much effort goes into trying to rig the system against the possibility, a strong enough electoral victory even for a para-socialist coalition will open the door to exponential electoral capture back from the right.

          Filibuster reform can take use to voting rights law, voting rights law can take use to congressional expansion, congressional expansion can take us to voting system reform and multi-seat districting, those can take us to unabashed leftists running independently or in a proper American Worker’s Party, and with the electoral viability of a solid leftist AWP, the sky is the goddamned limit, but to reach the heavens, you still gotta lay the brickwork down here on earth, and that means ya gotta vote.

          • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            and I’m sure you’ll remember it the instant you have an opportunity to talk about this or that elected socialist which the CIA had a hand in deposing

            Lol gottem

        • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          You say “build it up”, but what you really mean is “achieve revolution via electoralism” - which has no historical basis.

          Sure, if you’re completely ignorant of history…

    • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      Man it’s like I can hear how white the people you get your politics from are

      Nobody who actually lives the difference talks like this, get off your high horse.

    • Mastengwe@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      ROFL…. I said stupid too when I was a teenager. But not this stupid.

      Thanks for the laugh. I really need this.