• PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah, I’ve never denied the sarcasm. Sorry that you find tone policing more important than genocide.

      • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        Idk really seems like a stretch too suggest your impassioned defenses of the guy supporting the genocide is an indication of your outrage

        • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          5 months ago

          “Wow, I don’t understand how you can defend the guy who doesn’t want to commit genocide in the US, and is less gung-ho about the ongoing genocide in Gaza than the opposition?”

          It’s weird. I know, I should apparently support all genocide, everywhere, as often as possible, to be a good leftist according to these new standards, but for some reason, I keep gravitating towards the “Let’s not start up death camps in the US and run sorties over the West Bank and ensure as many Ukrainians are murdered as possible” option.

          Very strange, I know, seemingly incomprehensible to the Very Serious Leftist Brigade here on Lemmy.

          • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            What’s strange is that the totally-different-and-very-cool party keeps finding themselves in situations wherein they’re totally forced into committing atrocities themselves, but end up being OK because somehow there’s someone worse right behind them

            And it’s never actually their fault because there’s just too many people who support their totally unavoidable atrocities and if they don’t do them they’ll lose to the totally-worse-and-different monster party

            And the people who totally oppose the atrocities have no choice but to support the party conducting the atrocities because if they don’t, more atrocities will be done by the totally different and bad party and maybe actually against them and not the faceless foreigners they can forget about

            So strange

            • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              5 months ago

              What’s strange is that the totally-different-and-very-cool party keeps finding themselves in situations wherein they’re totally forced into committing atrocities themselves, but end up being OK because somehow there’s someone worse right behind them

              Yes, definitely, what’s going on is the Democratic Party decided to commit atrocities out of the blue. This definitely isn’t a long-standing US policy that was, until very recently, widely supported on all sides of the electorate. Wow, it’s a good thing politics are something simple that Manicheans with short attention spans can learn by half-paying attention to news reels for a month, otherwise we’d really be fucked, wouldn’t we?

              • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                And it’s never actually their fault because there’s just too many people who support their totally unavoidable atrocities and if they don’t do them they’ll lose to the totally-worse-and-different monster party

                This definitely isn’t a long-standing US policy that was, until very recently, widely supported on all sides of the electorate.

                • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  12
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Sorry that the idea of democracy reflecting the opinions of the majority is so alien to you. I understand autocracy might be more your speed.

                  • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    10
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    So it’s acceptable to support genocide as long as it’s a majority opinion? Are we morally relativistic now? It’s that what’s happening?