• tb_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    I doubt people earning over €227,000 a year have any issues paying for rent, why shouldn’t they get taxed more to bring earnings more in line? That way more money can go to support the lower earning demographics.

      • tb_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        No, that is not how it works.

        There’s a certain cost of living. Housing, food, transport. There’s a certain “floor” you have to earn or you’ll have a miserable time in the world as it is.

        Once you get above that earnings floor wealth suddenly starts to accumulate. You can get a nicer house, a fancier car, go out to eat and vacation more often. Which is all nice and good, people should be able to do such things, but those are secondary luxuries on top of what you need to live.

        So instead of taxing everything, say, 50%, the lower brackets are given some slack with reduced taxes.

          • tb_@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            To someone broke; €1000 is invaluable.

            To a millionaire; €1000 is another drop in the bucket.

            The first €1000 is so much more valuable than the 1000th. A flat rate across all earnings isn’t fair to the vast majority of those who can barely, or cannot make ends meet.

            The wealth gap is already growing, if anything millionaires aren’t being taxed enough. Singular persons do not need to have enough wealth to begin a small nation, I thought we left such fiefdoms behind with the middle ages.