• Lmaydev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Through properly monitored and implemented referendums, yeah.

    By a random dictatorship well known for destabilising and invading its neighbors, absolutely not.

    • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Through properly monitored and implemented referendums

      You say this shit like it isn’t a euphemism.

      By a random dictatorship

      Democracy

      us-foreign-policy

      Dictatorship

      • Nakoichi [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Come now I am trying to ask questions in an attempt to get them to question the shit they have been immersed in from birth. As excellent a use of that emoji as that is I think we have a miniscule chance to maybe reach this person if we can get the gears turning.

    • Nakoichi [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      And what gives you the right to determine what “properly monitored and implemented referendums” are?

      Also Russia is a dictatorship of the bourgeoisie just the same as the US so that argument holds zero water here.

      I am genuinely curious what your metrics for what constitutes a legitimate referendum are.

      • Lmaydev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nothing to do with me. I’m a programmer lol

        Nothing to do with the US. I wouldn’t support them invading a neighbor after a bogus vote they arranged. Whataboutism.

        Independent monitors to make sure the vote is fair.

          • 420blazeit69 [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The pure (libertarian) socialists’ ideological anticipations remain untainted by existing practice. They do not explain how the manifold functions of a revolutionary society would be organized, how external attack and internal sabotage would be thwarted, how bureaucracy would be avoided, scarce resources allocated, policy differences settled, priorities set, and production and distribution conducted. Instead, they offer vague statements about how the workers themselves will directly own and control the means of production and will arrive at their own solutions through creative struggle. No surprise then that the pure socialists support every revolution except the ones that succeed.

            –Michael Parenti, Blackshirts and Reds

            This is more of a comment on radlibs and baby anarchists, but it strikes me as appropriate here. It’s very easy to idealistically criticize everything that isn’t the way it should be. At some point, though, you have to address reality.

            • pingveno@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Come on, Freedom Loving Nations like Russia don’t use them to monitor their Totally Fair and Unbiased Elections.

        • FaceDeer@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not to mention that since 2022 this hasn’t been about just the Donbas any more.

          Indeed, last I checked Crimea wasn’t part of the Donbas either. This has never been about “protecting the self determination” of regions that so conveniently want to be invaded by Russia (according to Russia).

      • Skua@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        How does “the US is also bad” change anything about the argument? The argument was that Russia invading and annexing territory is not an expression of self-determination for the people whose homes are being annexed. The US also doing bad shit doesn’t change anything about that because “the US annexes Donbas instead of Russia” isn’t the alternative being presented here

        • FaceDeer@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The thing that amuses me the most about whataboutism is that it’s so self-defeating if you think about it for more than just a few seconds. It only makes “sense” from the perspective of someone who thinks that everybody must support their own home country’s actions no matter what. Which is an authoritarian thing, not a democracy thing.

          It also doesn’t account for the fact that I’m not even American, so when I see those arguments my “so what” shrug is doubly intense.

    • duderium [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      By a random dictatorship well known for destabilising and invading its neighbors, absolutely not.

      Definitely not talking about the USA. You are also not aware of the fact that the USA is sending troops to Peru to back a government that is currently supported by 6% of its people. But I’m sure this has no relevance at all to the situation in Ukraine. Despite its many honest mistakes (centuries of ongoing slavery and genocide), the USA has been overall a force for good in the world!

    • Washburn [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      In an ideal world where there was a good-faith international actor or organization who could take the role of moderating a referendum, and the outcome be respected by all parties, that would be ideal. However, no such organization exists. The institutions of the so-called “rules based international order” serve the interests of western hegemony. That is why, for example, Catalonia is not able to have an effective referendum for independence from Spain, and that is a perfectly fine state of affairs; just the way things are. Maybe a diplomatic complaint gets filed somewhere, maybe someone calls out how awful it is that police were interfering with the referendum in 2017, and they’re not wrong. But ultimately, nothing fundamentally changes, and that is the point.

      Should people just accept the way things are until an ideal situation allows them to improve their lives in a way everyone finds acceptable? What should people do if things are only getting worse, and there are no effective, good-faith actors to mediate the best possible solution?

      • Nakoichi [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        until an ideal situation allows them to improve their lives in a way everyone finds acceptable?

        Craziest part is that a lot of people that follow that line of thinking have also at least recognized the immediacy of police and prison abolition in the context of places like the US but can’t seem to take the next step in applying the same logic to places outside the imperial core.

      • Skua@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Large countries invading and annexing stuff is not a solution to any of those problems. It is a regression to an even worse system.