alessandro@lemmy.ca to PC Gaming@lemmy.ca · 2 months agoNintendo's lawsuit against Palworld isn't just bad for the industry, it's bad for Nintendowww.pcgamer.comexternal-linkmessage-square31fedilinkarrow-up1196arrow-down111cross-posted to: games@lemmy.world
arrow-up1185arrow-down1external-linkNintendo's lawsuit against Palworld isn't just bad for the industry, it's bad for Nintendowww.pcgamer.comalessandro@lemmy.ca to PC Gaming@lemmy.ca · 2 months agomessage-square31fedilinkcross-posted to: games@lemmy.world
minus-squareDonut@leminal.spacelinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down6·2 months agoThe article itself admits that it’s hinged on two “substantial what if’s” Just be patient and wait until more information comes out.
minus-squareWalrusDragonOnABike [they/them]@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down2·2 months agoWe know it’s a patent suit though. Just because the article focuses on specific patents doesn’t mean those parents are not already ridiculous and that the lawsuit, even if it’s not based on those specific patents, is also ridiculous.
minus-squareBaggins [he/him]@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·edit-22 months agoIf you read the article, those “ifs” are only in reference to whether a US suit will be filed. The analysis of Nintendo’s BS patents all makes sense.
The article itself admits that it’s hinged on two “substantial what if’s”
Just be patient and wait until more information comes out.
We know it’s a patent suit though. Just because the article focuses on specific patents doesn’t mean those parents are not already ridiculous and that the lawsuit, even if it’s not based on those specific patents, is also ridiculous.
If you read the article, those “ifs” are only in reference to whether a US suit will be filed. The analysis of Nintendo’s BS patents all makes sense.