• Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Ukraine is probably the most recent example. Russia invaded them but before that they threw their president out purely with people in the street.

      In Egypt they caused a change of governance that wasn’t a total improvement but was an improvement.

      In Tunisia and Algeria they got favorable changes in government.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          1964 civil rights act

          Suffragette movement

          Prohibition

          The original crowd in Boston that started our country

          • wolfpack86@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yeah, little known fact that the dudes in Boston accomplished so much through non violence, that the American revolution was actually just for the sport of it. Kinda like pro wrestling.

      • bigpEE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yanukovych fled because people started raiding armories and shooting at Berkut. In Egypt the army sided with the protestors. Don’t know Tunisia and Algeria off the dome but I doubt there was no violence or threat of imminent violence

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Once you have enough people that is the threat.

          That’s what so many people in this thread are missing. Without a visible critical mass of people showing support they’re going to be dismissed as a small group of armed dissidents and everyone will stay home and cheer when we kill the terrorists.

          With that critical mass of support the “government” would be forced to either abdicate or deploy force in the most immoral manner possible. Against an overwhelming show of support. Which swings it all the other way. This is why dictators shut down the Internet during protests.

          So they may still get what is clearly their wish. But for the good of the country it needs to be done the right way if Trump steals the election.

        • orcrist@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Of course there was some violence. You think the cops are going to be peaceful? Ha!

    • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      They don’t have any, they just know you’re supposed to say “take to the streets” because they think they’re a 1960s radical rehearsing boomer protest tactics. As though things might not have changed in the last 60 years.

      Counter-protest tactics have continuously adapted and evolved – from technology to legislation to media manipulation. Protest tactics have not kept pace, evidenced by the fact that this person thinks street protests have created effective change in the last 20 years.

        • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          If you follow the thread here, this is in a US context (the “we” referenced by the commenter), and it’s about “non-violent” protests, given the commenter said violent protests have been “protracted” with “low rates of success.” Euromaidan activists seized the government quarter by force and stormed Yanukovych’s mansion.

          While I take your point, this isn’t a particularly illustrative example in this context.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            No this is exactly what it looks like. They filled the streets and they didn’t go into his mansion until he fled after the Army turned on him for using lethal force against the crowd.

            Just like the water hoses and dogs picture was very resonant in the US. The 1964 civil rights act was passed the next year after that photo went viral.

            • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              The 1964 civil rights act was passed the next year after that photo went viral.

              A year is an extraordinarily long time with an illegitimate occupant of the White House, pardoning himself for anything he chooses to do.

              I don’t think the measures that were effective during the civil rights era are at all suitable for addressing such a fundamental breach of the constitution.

              • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                That was because the remedy protestors asked for was legislative and they accepted legislative lag as a reality.

                The remedy if Trump or SCOTUS fucks around is immediate abdication.