It will widen your horizon, they said. And here I was, foolishly thinking I could get away with half-assing statistics during my degree.

  • Saleh@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    16 days ago

    Engineering formulas be like

    “So there was this guy in 1896 and he did a bunch of trials and he figured out that a+b*x/c² is close enough to the real results, with values for a in range 1-2 and b in range 3-4. We still don’t understand why, or how he got there, but it worked ever since.”

    • Xavienth@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 days ago

      “More recent research has produced a more precise emperical relation, -4.2x^3.761+√(sin(2x²/π))±erf(e²ˣ+37), which produces results which are 0.2% more accurate on average.”