• Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago
    • A government imposes taxation on the citizens to fund the services the citizens are required to use for daily life.

    Libertarians: “GOD THIS IS AN UNJUST TYRANNY TO ME AND ONLY ME”

    • A corporation imposes a new service fee and increases the subcription charges, to fund their wallets and act like its better than it was before.

    Libertarians: “This is normal and just, everyone is stupid except for me, I read Ayn Rand.”

    I’m down to talk out what is a just tax, what is unfair, what the taxes should go to once collected, but I think Libertarians are too hooked on think tank propaganda to decide something for themselves.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It’s even better: a lot of essential or close to it things are pretty much monopolies or cartels (for example, Internet access in most of the US) so people have no actual choice but to pay a specific entity whatever they chose to charge.

      It’s like tax but without the upside of taxes (which is that they’re money that’s supposed to entirely end up benefiting you, even if most of it indirectly) because when you buy a product or service from a monopoly or cartel only part of it goes to cover the cost of the actual product or service you’re getting and a large fraction or even most of it goes to shareholder dividends, which has zero benefit for you.

      I’ve taken to call these things Taxes Paid Directly To Private Companies.

    • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Corporations are fucked up. They will never allow the state to be abolished because they need to collect taxes in order to bail themselves out of trouble and in order to fight wars for them at the taxpayer expense so they can reap the profits… a corporation will never go to war alone. War is fucking expensive and is rarely directly profitable. They want to socialize expenses and privatize gain, which is impossible to do without a government of some kind.

        • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          …so, what, we’re supposed to build an entire society on people’s inherent willingness to help each other and just trust that crime will stop happening?

          Like mate, I hate to break it to you, but psychopaths exist. The entire problem with capitalism is that some people are never satisfied no matter how much they have and will do anything they possibly can to hoard anything that could give them an advantage at the expense of the group.

          • undergroundoverground@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            2 months ago

            Its true, the things that stop crime can only ever be made by a state.

            In fact, people never managed to stop or punish theft or a murder until we invesnted states.

            Yup, before states, if someone came a murdered your friend you had to trust that what you just witnessed didn’t happen because there was literally nothing you could do about it, as states hadn’t been invented yet.

            Its good thing were too smart to fall for that…

            • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              2 months ago

              …and your proposed alternative is…?

              I really, really hope I don’t have to explain why vigilante justice is a bad idea.

              • Clent@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                I heard him say he murdered his friend.

                Pity there is no third party to investigate my claim. We’ll just have to string him up ourselves.

                I call dibs on his shoes.

                • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Well, in a society without judges, as the article linked proposes, I’m having a hard time seeing it any other way.

              • undergroundoverground@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                Lol nice try but I don’t have to provide you with an alternative for you to attack. You’re wasting youre time there.

                The point is, even all those hundreds of years ago, we had an alternative to just trusting that crime wouldn’t exist, as you suggested was the only alternative.

                Other than its state-ness exaplin the difference between state vigilante justice and the exact equivalent done by any other kind of group.

                I really, really hope I don’t have to explain why it being done by a state doesn’t magically make it better, in of itself.

                • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  Lol nice try but I don’t have to provide you with an alternative for you to attack. You’re wasting youre time there.

                  “See, the thing is, I already know I’m right, so I’m not going to waste time by giving you arguments to find flaws in.”

                  I really, really hope I don’t have to explain why it being done by a state doesn’t magically make it better, in of itself.

                  …you mean why a system of justice that is held liable to a court system is not superior to a system of justice where people can just go after whomever they want? yeah, you do have to explain that actually

                  • undergroundoverground@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    See, the thing is, I already know I’m right, so I’m not going to waste time by giving you arguments to find flaws in.”

                    Again, nice try but I’m used to people as slippery as you. What you mean is “you’re right, we don’t just have to sit around and trust that crime doesn’t exist. However, I’m the kind of person who really struggles to back down or walk back even the most wild and silly of things that I imply.”

                    you mean why a system of justice that is held liable to a court system is not superior to a system of justice where people can just go after whomever they want? yeah, you do have to explain that actually

                    Why would I explain something completely different to what I said to you?

            • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Before states if someone murdered your friend it would either split the tribe and/or you’d go to war with the tribe that killed your friend. Is that really better?

    • aidan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      One is something you choose to pay, the other you get shot if you don’t pay. There is a pretty big difference.

      • booly@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        One is something you choose to pay, the other you get shot if you don’t pay.

        Contract claims and property claims are ultimately enforceable by government force, as well. A “no trespassing” or “no loitering” sign, or a “Copyrighted work, all rights reserved” notice is enforceable by men with guns, too.

        If taxation is theft, the same reasoning would extend to property being theft, too.

        • aidan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Depends how the property was claimed. Most property in the US was illegitimately claimed.