• Microw@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 months ago

    Theoretically, yes. Practically, the way their model is set up, it costs a lot to host a federated server so no one is doing it.

      • Microw@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        What you see on Bluesky is a lot of people using their own domains for their handles. They are not hosting their own instances though, it’s only their identities. Their connection to the AT protocol still goes through the central Bluesky server.

        • dan@upvote.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          lot of people using their own domains for their handles. They are not hosting their own instances

          This is something the AT Protocol does well. Your identity is portable and can be separate from the instance you use.

          In theory, you can move to a different instance but keep your handle the same. There’s no way to do that with ActivityPub. If you move to a new Lemmy or Mastodon server, you have to change your username to one at the instance’s domain.

        • timconspicuous@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          If we’re talking about self-hosting your own personal data storage (PDS), a few hundred people are doing that, here is a list. Apparently a Raspberry Pi is sufficient to host a PDS.