How Intellectual Property Laws Stifle Innovation | Mises Institute
mises.org
Supporters of intellectual property laws claim that people will not innovate unless they are protected by such legislation. In reality, people are more likely

In conclusion, while the alleged intention behind intellectual property laws may be to foster innovation, their practical effect is often to hinder it. The right to innovate—to freely explore, develop, and share new ideas—is fundamental to human progress and should not be unduly restricted by overzealous attempts to commodify knowledge. As we navigate the complex landscape of 21st-century innovation, it is crucial to critically examine and reform IP laws to ensure they serve their intended purpose of promoting progress rather than stifling it.

  • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
    7·
    16 days ago

    Not the original goal… But under the modern corpo regime, it is a tool of oppression of workers and customers tho

    Hence why i follow honnor system now. If you are a bad faith actor, i dont pay for your “IP”