Summary

The U.S. Supreme Court’s July ruling in Trump v United States granted Donald Trump immunity from criminal prosecution for actions taken in his official capacity changes fundamentally the dynamics of the Oval Office. This decision shields a sitting president from legal accountability for official acts, enabling unlawful behavior without consequence.

Critics, including Michael Waldman of the Brennan Center for Justice, argue that this ruling provides a “how-to guide” for presidential lawbreaking.

The Supreme Court’s conservative supermajority, solidified by Trump’s three appointees, has previously overturned Roe v. Wade, and now, with this immunity ruling, further consolidates presidential power. If Trump is re-elected, this immunity could embolden him to pursue aggressive policies without fear of legal repercussions, raising concerns about unchecked executive authority and the erosion of democratic checks and balances.

  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    That’s literally his fucking goal. So much wishy washy bullshit language “could.” How about will.

    When people tell you who they are, believe them the first time.

  • Nougat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Have you seen SCOTUS? Has. And wholly enabled by the GOP, when McConnell was Speaker.

    Fuck all of them.

    • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Actively blocking appointments from one party then packing it full of another party. The blame doesn’t lie solely with Trump. All of these headlines are disingenuous for so many reasons it makes me nauseous.

      • adarza@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        4 hours ago

        scotus should be 5-4 the other way, if not for that fuckface hypocrite moscow mitch.

  • TheOneWithTheHair@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    If Trump wins, RFK, jr will be in charge of healthcare. Bobby is anti-vax. If you want ANY vaccinations – if Trump wins (or otherwise games the system for a win through lawsuits, etc.) – you better get them before Jan 20, 2025, otherwise, you might need to go to Canada/Mexico just to get a vaccination.

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Similarly, with the Trump Tariffs, you better buy any tech shit you need now, or it will become impossibly unaffordable.

  • MyOpinion@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    He has taken control of the supreme court in this first term and in his next he will finish the job for all courts he has access to. If it is an official act he can do it without fear of prosecution .

  • Media Bias Fact Checker@lemmy.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago
    The Guardian - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

    Information for The Guardian:

    Wiki: reliable - There is consensus that The Guardian is generally reliable. The Guardian’s op-eds should be handled with WP:RSOPINION. Some editors believe The Guardian is biased or opinionated for politics. See also: The Guardian blogs.
    Wiki: mixed - Most editors say that The Guardian blogs should be treated as newspaper blogs or opinion pieces due to reduced editorial oversight. Check the bottom of the article for a “blogposts” tag to determine whether the page is a blog post or a non-blog article. See also: The Guardian.


    MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United Kingdom


    Search topics on Ground.News

    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2024/nov/02/trump-immunity-election-supreme-court

    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support