• garbagebagel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Canada won’t go around calling out other people’s genocide when it can’t even recognize its own. Not in their (the govs) best interests.

  • Godort@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Not super surprising. We tend to follow whatever the US does in terms of international politics.

    • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah but sometimes we put our foot down like with Iraq.

      Except this time, were selling military equipment to Israel, so local company profits are at stake. So of course our government will support this genocide.

      Not to mention the government has the B’nai B’rith and ADF up their asses ready to call everyone antisemite as soon as someone looks at Israel the wrong way.

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      This isn’t a game or movie there are not bad and good guys. Both sides are right and wrong for different reasons.

      • DarthJon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        10 hours ago

        No. The inability to accept that genocidal Islamist terrorists are bad guys shows just how morally confused the left is.

        • Zacpod@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Sorry, good guys don’t shoot schoolgirls in the back, and then in the head while she lays dying, and then get promoted. There are no good guys in this conflict - both sides suck ass.

      • small44@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        The colonizer is the bad guy and the colonized in the good guy. It’s that simple

        • DarthJon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          10 hours ago

          In one single sentence you summed up everything wrong with the left and their perspective on Israel (not to mention the entire world).

        • sailingbythelee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          15 hours ago

          This is a lazy and simplistic worldview. Every single square mile of land has been colonized, conquered, re-conquered, and conquered again. In other words, every culture has been both colonizer and colonized. Human migration has been occurring since time immemorial, and human migration generally means displacing whomever was there before. It is often a chain reaction, where one migration causes another, causes another, ad infinitum throigh history. In the most dramatic situations we sometimes label it genocide, but usually it’s more of a slow blending of cultures (and genes) over time.

          • jerkface@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 hours ago

            carrying water for colonialism even though you probably don’t even benefit from it. why do people act like this. like conservative working class people who keep voting for tax cuts for the rich, as though they are “temporarily inconvenienced millionaires”.

            • sailingbythelee@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              11 hours ago

              Look at the result of the US election and tell me why you think it is beneficial to promulgate this simplistic colonizer/colonized, oppressor/oppressed narrative. It is no longer useful. Identity politics has become the new McCarthyism of the left. I am on the left, and I want us to extract our heads from our collective asses and start talking about things that matter to non-indoctrinated people.

          • small44@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 hours ago

            This does not contradict what I said. When we was the occupied we was the good guy and when we were the occupied we became the bad guy

            • sailingbythelee@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 hours ago

              When Germanic tribes invaded the Roman Empire because they were pushed West by the Mongols, were they the bad guys? When the Romans killed Germanic peoples to prevent them crossing the border, were the Romans the good guys? When illegal immigrants cross the US border in their literal millions to escape the poverty and oppression of central America, are they the bad guys? When the Anishnawbec tribes invaded the territory of the Sioux and expelled them because they were pushed West by the Algonquin, were they the bad guys? The Inuit killed the Dene who were encroaching on their territory because of starvation, were they the bad guys or were the Dene the bad guys? When Hannibal invaded Rome and killed thousands of Italians over several years and attempted to genocide Rome, was he the bad guy, or was Rome the bad guy when they subsequently invaded Carthage and ended the war once and for all? Who were more evil, the Arabs who bought Afrcian slaves, or the African tribes who kidnapped their own people and sold them to the Arabs? History is a series of actions and reactions, not a set of good guys and bad guys.

              • small44@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 hours ago

                You are really calling mass illegal migration colonization? The only example of colonization you provided in Carthage vs roman and both was the bad guy because they was imperial powers fighting each other and it was Roman who ended up genociding Carthage in the 3rd punic war. I don’t compare evils, evil is evil no matter who is doing

                • sailingbythelee@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  6 hours ago

                  Sure. How do you imagine colonization actually happens? It is rarely a bunch of conquistadors invading and defeating the local population and then genociding them. It is almost always a long process of migration, perhaps punctuated by conflict and perhaps not. The Greeks founded colonies all over the Mediterranean and the Black Sea, some of which exist to this day. Not every colony becomes an overwhelming nation state. When various Germanic tribes invaded Rome at various times, they came and settled on Roman territory in their own little colonies, sometimes with authorization and sometimes not. When the first Europeans came to North America, they set up tiny little agricultural colonies and mostly had a peaceful (if awkward) coexistence with the local native tribes.

                  Over time, though, the power balance may change and then the colonists may start to demand more control. If the original and the invading cultures aren’t compatible, or if resources are scarce, they may end up at war with each other. What you think of as “colonization” is the most extreme form where one side is so technologically superior and aggressive that the original inhabitants simply have no chance. The weaker culture is subsumed and perhaps even destroyed by the stronger one. But it rarely starts out that way. Colonization is a spectrum from small colonies within a larger dominant culture to extreme cases where the colonizing culture completely displaces the existing inhabitants, and everything in between.

                  So, is it really as simple as good guys and bad guys? If you think so, think about it some more with a more objective and less doctrinaire lens.

          • DarthJon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            10 hours ago

            It’s rare, but every now and then I find a voice of reason on this website. Thank you.

        • BreathingUnderWater@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Are you a colonizer too? Unless you’re 100% First Nations (you aren’t) then you are by your own logic a colonizer and doing harm.

          • small44@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            May ancestors yes not people of my current country. Nobody is responsible of their ancestors wrong doing

          • sailingbythelee@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            15 hours ago

            Even if they are 100% First Nations, their ancestors were also colonizers. First Nations tribes warred and displaced one another regularly.

  • BonerMan@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    Sige… Sige is when you get shot by thousands of terrorist rockets and defend yourself…

    • HungryJerboa@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      No, siege is when you are suffering from a famine because a government that hasn’t received a vote in 15 years picked a fight with a heavily armed neighbor, and said neighbor collectively punishes all of your people for their mistakes (which is a war crime, btw).