• TheKMAP@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      Before I finished reading I was gonna say that while I love Bernie, him talking shit now seemed pretty “hindsight 20/20” considering he endorsed her.

      But the “serious convo” and “stay tuned” is interesting. I hope he overthrows DNC or starts his own shit with AOC.

      • Pilferjinx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        45
        ·
        2 months ago

        Dude, most of us kept our mouth shut as to not dissuade people from voting. Obviously it wasn’t enough. But now we can gripe and cope freely.

        • girsaysdoom@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 months ago

          Exactly, dividing the left-wing even more would only lead to failure. The best action was to unify to squeak by, but it didn’t work this time obviously.

        • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’ve been catching a lot of flack lately from other leftists because I’ve been preaching the lesser evil for 4 months. That’s profoundly stupid, but I get it. Maybe I should’ve shilled even harder, anyway here we are.

          At least it’ll be nice to stop justifying evil just because it’s lesser.

          • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 months ago

            I appreciate BJG giving him a little shit because it was honestly irritating seeing him bow down to the DNC, at the same time, I think he truly thought he could push them left and that Trump is an existential threat to democracy.

            Now he’s seen over and over that the DNC has no intention of actually changing and was just paying lip service to the left, I hope he has big plans.

            • Guy Dudeman@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 months ago

              He’s not going to run in 2028. AOC is going to run in 2028. And she’ll lose just like Kamala did, because she’s been bowing to the donors as well.

              • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                I never said he would, and I agree that AOC has conformed to the DNC way more then she should have, but it goes back to the same basic fear tactic the DNC has been using to keep them in line, hopefully it’s now clear (as it seems to be with Bernies post) that they’re full of shit

                Edit: My hope is a real grassroots movement to incite change and promote progressive ideals without the DNC influence, our revolution was kinda like that but it fizzled out under the weight of the DNC and Bernie wasn’t front and center leading it. Just imo

                • Guy Dudeman@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  DSA doesn’t seem to be picking up steam anymore either. I believe it got infiltrated by wreckers who created divisions within the movement.

      • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        You play offense when it’s right to play offense and play defense when you need to play defense. I respect Bernie for knowing he can’t change the system so he will do his part in influencing it.

      • DiagnosedADHD@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Everyone fell in line, because the DNC had us all by the balls. I’m tired of it. Now is the time to speak out, not 3.5 years from now.

    • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      Trump being the youngest at 78 is already too old if you ask me. If the US had a ceremonial presidency like many parliamentary republics then that’d be fine but for an active head politician that’s just too old imo

  • RubicTopaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    He would actually advance working class interests though, and all billionaire/corporate funding to the Democrats would be cut off as a result; Dems wouldn’t let that happen.

    That’s the point of liberal “democracies” after all: keeping capitalists in power.

    Get organized, that excuse of a democracy won’t save you.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 months ago

        You need a congealed working class before you can have a democracy. Right now, we have a fractured and alienated working class, so all we get are the motions.

        • Gigantic voting districts where elected officials are lucky to know one constituent in 10,000.
        • Systematic disenfranchisement of young voters, poc, and the internally displaced.
        • Strict limits placed on individual bureaucrats who must pander to the broadly empowered private business interests.
        • A fully captured court system that can tip the scales of an election.
        • No regional autonomy. No public civil defense. No guarantee of political education. No right to free association of labor.

        How do you engage with a democracy on those terms? What democracy is there to engage with? An election that is simply another consumer choice isn’t democratic. You still have no control over what you’re being offered and no participation on how the system is administered.

        • NeilBrü@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          What you’ve listed are critiques. I agree with many of them. What I’m asking specifically is if not democracy, then what instead?

          On paper, the United States is a federal republic, that votes for representatives for a bicameral parliamentary system that derives jurisprudence from English Common Law.

          In practice, it’s a plutocratic oligarchy.

          For context, I consider myself to be a market socialist who still wants a representative federal republic for the United States.

          I have my own ideas for re-enfranchisement for the working class:

          • abolish “first-past-the-post”
          • restructure gerrymandered voting districts
          • implement ranked choice voting
          • constitutional amendment for term limits for every elected position
          • allow cross-party voting in primaries
          • abolishing Citizens United (what a cynically ironic name for what it actually allows for)

          These points are only achievable by voting for candidates who advocate for such policies which is admittedly a long shot, given the average citizen’s knowledge of civics, political theory, economics, and statistics but it’s what I believe can work.

          Or would you prefer autocracy? The “dictatorship of the proletariat”? Monarchy? Theocracy? Anarchy? Oligarchy? Syndicalism?

          My ultimate point is that you seem to still want “democracy”, but you want it in practice, not just on paper, despite your claim of the point of democracies is to “keep capitalists in power”.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            These points are only achievable by voting for candidates who advocate for such policies which is admittedly a long shot

            Politics is the art of the possible. The entire job of political leadership is to advocate for policy change.

            • NeilBrü@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              Again, My question to you is if not democracy, then what? Or do you actually want democracy? Please propose your alternative to democracy, given your claim about its purpose in “keeping capitalists in power”.

              • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Or do you actually want democracy?

                I want good policy.

                If my democracy is producing bad candidates and bad policies, what purpose does it serve?

                your alternative to democracy, given your claim about its purpose in “keeping capitalists in power”.

                Capitalism is serviced by the illusion of choice in a functional monopoly. The solution is to break up the monopoly.

                But that’s a Herculean task.

                • J Lou@mastodon.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  You can’t get good policy without democracy because democracy is part of all good policy. Non-democracy violates inalienable rights, which makes it inherently bad policy

                  @politicalmemes

  • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I agree 100% we needed him. If you asked me 8 years ago I’d even say I honestly believe we, as Americns, deserve him. I’m now very seriously wondering that. It’s starting to feel like we don’t. Im against collective punishment so I don’t mean to say that implies people who are going to suffer from this deserve their suffering, but I’m not sure that implies we deserve a politician like him. Glad as hell we have him in whatever office we can though.

    • MrPoopbutt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Just because the shitstains that voted trump dont deserve him doesn’t mean the rest of us dont.

  • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    The DNC needs to go. All of it. Literally just gone. There needs to be a real left grassroots party that maintains a much more tight ideological vision and focuses internally.

    • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 months ago

      He already did, didn’t you see the refreshing band of green next to his name amid all the red and blue? He generally votes the same as the Dems though.

    • tyo_ukko@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      He won’t. He knows splitting the D vote will guarantee an R win. Unlike many voters who think they’re making a statement.

        • tyo_ukko@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          Then, unfortunately, you are with the republicans. I’m personally looking forward to the DNC primaries in 2-3 years. Maybe we’ll see the next Bernie take a stance. The point is, the DNC primaries are where you should make your point.

          • DJDarren@thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            I’m not American, but because their politics looms so large I’m kind of forced to pay attention. And I have to say, I’m real fucking bored of waiting for the Democrats to back the next Bernie. I swear I’ve been reading about The Next Bernie since they shafted The Original Bernie in 2016.

            • tyo_ukko@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Well, buckle up. Progress is slow, but if we’re very lucky we’ll see some within our lifetimes. Not in the next 4 years tho.

              • DiagnosedADHD@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                And this is why the DNC must be destroyed.

                You can’t get Americans to vote if you are just like “you don’t deserve an interesting candidate, not in 4 years, not ever” this has been the fucking case since 2016. The DNC had ample time, but they’ve done nothing but drop the ball.

          • khaliso@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            It’s really fucking tiring to see you americans singing along to the tune of the ‘us vs them’ rhethoric.

            I don’t know what he has planned, but in my book he’s the most likely candidate to break the 2-party system.

            • tyo_ukko@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Jokes on you, I’m not American at all! I suppose it takes a certain number of years on the planet to see that the 2-party system is not going anywhere. You just have to accept to play within the constraints and hope to get the best you can.

  • pinkystew@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    The elites cackling at Bernie’s funeral: he told them exactly what the problem was and how to fix it and they ignored him LOLOLOLOL

  • Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 months ago

    I could be wrong but polling I’ve seen says 83% of black men and 93% black women voted Democrat. Latinos and White people voted closer to 50% between the two parties

    • lennybird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Latinos were the biggest loss as far as I can tell. There is a host of reasons why this group crumbled.

      Let’s see how they like seeing family members deported.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Not just family members.

        If you and your entire family are suddenly thrown in a cage, who are you gonna call to grab your birth certificate from the safe deposit box?

  • Awesomo85@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    Don’t you all worry your pretty little heads about any of this. In 4 years, the DNC will pick yet another anointed candidate for you to fall in line behind like good little boys and girls. And you all will dance and scream for joy and you will punish and cast out any who show signs of opposition to the one true anointed candidate.

    As it was, is now and ever shall be. World without end of the Almighty DNC, Amen.

  • frengo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    Italiano
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    This man would be TOO good for any country. His visions are out of this world, he would have a lot of powerful enemies. Americans would probably kill him in the first month of an hypothetical presidency.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Bernie beating Trump is a nice fantasy, but it wouldn’t happen either.

    This election was an information war, and the Democrats fought it like they’re in another century. And they’re going to lose again if they think sensible policy, however revolutionary and in-touch, and hopeful TV ads are how you win elections.

    They need their own form of MAGA. And they need to flood and poison the internet and airwaves just like the Republicans did.

      • Final Remix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        We’ll capitulate hard and “meet them across the aisle.” That’ll surely work this time! Now, how far’s that aisle slid off to?

    • cybervseas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      A Democratic MAGA equivalent would be quickly literally bulldozed by the militarized police nationwide.

    • tyo_ukko@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Bernie beating Trump is a nice fantasy, but it wouldn’t happen either.

      You don’t know this. The DNC doesn’t know this (otherwise, why did Harris take such a beating?). There certainly is an argument for that, but it’s no way guaranteed. Sure, he might lose some finance bros in NY, but Bernie would definitely speak exactly to the people in the swing states. People who look at Trump to fix their economic problems without anything concrete.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        They don’t care. It’s clearly not about the message, it’s the delivery, and Bernie would have used the same apparatus Harris used.