A similar question was raised some day’s ago from a other person, but with different background. In this case, I would like to buy a nice gaming laptop. Of course I would use it for office and coding to, but primary I’m searching recommendations for gaming. I would like to play Wine/Proton game’s and also native Linux games. As OS, I like to use Manjaro Gnome.

Should I better buy all of AMD (if yes, which CPI, GPU) or Intel/Nvidia? Or Intel CPU and AMD GPU? Which combination is the right one with best performance for a casual gamer? I prefer FPS games, if that’s important…

  • woelkchen@lemmy.world
    6·
    10 months ago

    The unfortunate side of AMD in laptops is that we are on a major point of deprecation and change. […] it doesn’t have a massive impact for gamers […] The average gamer doesn’t really interact much with this stuff.

    Quite a long bit of anti-AMD FUD and NVidia promo for what is completely unrelated to OP’s question, as you outright say with two sentences. OP asked about gaming notebooks and not CUDA.

    you need to run Fedora.

    OP said to wish to use Manjaro Gnome. Basically you’re like “I’m throwing a bunch of mud against AMD for a use case you’re not interested in and then go ahead and tell you that your choice of OS is wrong.”

    • j4k3@lemmy.worldEnglish
      12·
      10 months ago

      Quite a bit of under the hood and real issues at a deeper level, along with a proven path of least resistance.

      I don’t care how it makes you, me, or anyone else feel. The hardware support at the kernel level is the most important factor in overall experience. I do not like Nvidia at all. I wanted to buy AMD and tried really hard to make that happen, but it simply isn’t competitive in the laptop space. The first decent options will be announced in the next few months as 7k hardware makes it into laptops. The 6k stuff is generations behind Nvidia.

      I have two computers running libre boot. One is fully compiled from the bootloader up and running Gentoo. I would only run this if it could handle the workload. I am not a fanboi fool. I will call out shit for what it is. Maybe you can get by with deprecated stuff. Maybe you don’t mind if it is not supported in a couple of years. I’m just telling you why the writing is on the wall and what to look for. If that motivates your emotional nonsense response, whatever.

      • woelkchen@lemmy.world
        6·
        10 months ago

        The hardware support at the kernel level is the most important factor in overall experience.

        https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu?h=v6.5

        it simply isn’t competitive in the laptop space.

        To quote you: “I can’t tell you anything about gaming.”

        I will call out shit for what it is.

        “I can’t tell you anything about gaming.”

        I am not a fanboi fool.

        Funny how you tell stories about completely different issues the post is about just to promote NVidia…

        Maybe you can get by with deprecated stuff. Maybe you don’t mind if it is not supported in a couple of years.

        The only company outright deprecating older GPUs is NVidia who don’t support anything before Turing for Wayland. AMD drivers are fully open source and are also being worked on by Valve and Collabora for the Steam Deck. If anything, AMD hardware is more likely to be supported in quite some time because of Steam Deck but you wouldn’t know this because you “can’t tell anything about gaming.”