Even gamers nexus’ Steve today said that they’re about to start doing Linux games performance testing soon. It’s happening, y’all, the year of the Linux desktop is upon us. ᕕ(ᐛ)ᕗ

Edit: just wanted to clarify that Steve from GN didn’t precisely say they’re starting to test soon, he said they will start WHEN the steam OS releases and is adopted. Sorry about that.

  • john89@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I’ve been saying for years: we need a dedicated gaming operating system.

  • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I have about 7-9 months to decide what to do with my PC. I don’t want to move to windows 11. Because I will have to basically fresh-install my entire system that has 4 drives and god knows how many antiquated programs on it from the XP, Vista and 7 era that I still use. and Im just not ready for it. Im too busy

    headache

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    As long as they can keep it rolling stable, which is possible even with arch, I can see this pickup up a bit, especially for new users.

    Plenty of users are sick of windows 11.

  • Noved@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    New to the Linux community here; why is a valve owned Linux OS better than any other massive company OS. Like if Microsoft released their own Linux OS, would it be good suddenly?

    At the end of the day, we don’t want our OS’s big company owned right?

    • Zetta@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      Valve dosnt really “own” SteamOS. They maintain and update SteamOS, but SteamOS is free and open source

      Plus just about everbody who knows anything about steam would tell you they are probably the most consumer friendly billion dollar company ever, and have been for decades. So yes even if they owned it like microsoft owns windows it would still be better

    • doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Like if Microsoft released their own Linux OS, would it be good suddenly?

      It’s worth noting that steamOS, like any Linux distro has its issues and a bit of a learning curve. Especially if you want to go off the beaten track, it’s pretty much just using a stock arch distro.

      As for if MS switched to Linux, no it wouldn’t be good because the issues with Win11 overwhelmingly aren’t a matter of incompetence or anything inherent to the code, but of conscious anti-consumer business decisions. There’s nothing about Linux that would actively stop MS from cramming telemetry, bloat, etc. In their distro.

    • john89@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      SteamOS is better than, for example, macOS and Windows because of licenses.

      Since you’re new (welcome!), I should let you in on a little secret: pretty much the entire free software movement is built around licensing. I know, it’s boring and seems insignificant. But the outcomes are profound.

      Because SteamOS is built to function within the free software ecosystem, it means users are never beholden to the decisions of one centralized entity (usually the company that owns the software patents.)

      If Valve ever decides to, say, include candy crush ads in SteamOS’ start menu (they’d have to make their own start menu, since right now SteamOS uses one that’s already made by the free software community), then users can choose to remove that part of the menu or replace the menu altogether without having to start from scratch.

      For wealthy people who can always pay the “proprietary tax,” this might seem like a non-issue. Practically speaking, these people only want their software to work without hassle. They don’t care about the true cost of that software, such as only one entity being able to modify/distribute the software. It’s not until, say, photoshop starts charging a subscription (which they can always increase the price of) that people start to see the value in free software and the importance of licensing.

    • beaiouns@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      If it’s like the steam deck version, it’ll be based on Arch with a bunch of steam-specific patches/configs to make games run more easily (with the added bonus of making non-steam games run pretty well too). Steam exists to sell games, and if they want to make it easier for me to play games, that’s fine by me.

      Not sure what a Microsoft distro would look like, but if they make a distro that’ll run Xbox games with gamepass, I’d give it a shot.

      Another nice bonus for either/both of those situations is that it wouldn’t be too hard to incorporate those changes into other distros. That way people who want more of an “install and go” experience would have their official distros, people who like to tinker could work on importing the official code into their unofficial setup, and people who use arch btw can install it from the AUR.

    • Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Microsoft is deeply entrenched and has undergone decades of enshittification. SteamOS is at only the beginning of this cycle. And since SteamOS is linux-based, it’s likely to have ramifications for the whole GNU/Linux ecosystem. Furthermore, if there are two vastly different OSes that developers and graphics card manufacturers need to seriously target, they’re more likely to write more platform-agnostic software that everyone can benefit from.

    • Grofit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Not answering your comment directly, and I don’t even use Linux, BUT…

      One reason a lot of us don’t use Linux even if we really want to us because it’s biggest strength is also one of its biggest weaknesses, that being it’s modularity.

      There isn’t a single packaging system, window manager, file system, shell, etc etc.

      This makes it hard for companies (and devs in general) to target Linux for releases. For example you want to release something for Windows, you build a single exe, apple is a dmg (I think) etc so you just build for one single platform with a consistent API.

      When you want to build for Linux there can’t be just one build/package. This has actively been cited as reasons why some commercial software doesn’t support Linux, as it takes far more effort to support all major permutations of platform and package management.

      So back to your question, why is Valve’s Steam OS going to help? Because it’s going to be a single platform with a single way of doing things. You can always go and replace the bits like any Linux distro but out the box it will be easy enough for vendors to support, it will hopefully also get more adoption because it has commercial support.

      Look at Android as an example (I know it’s not entirely the same), but that is just a customised version of Linux, but as it’s consistent and has a single way to manage packages it’s widely adopted.

      I am pretty sure Linus himself said how one of the reasons why Linux desktop doesn’t have mass adoption is because no one can agree on how things should be done, so we have hundreds of libs all doing the same thing in a different way. Valve will pick what they think is best (even if it isn’t technically the best) and through that we all have a singular point of effort and adoption to centralise on.

    • penquin@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Because valve is a private company. They don’t have to answer to shareholders. That means, they don’t go through enshitifaction, they care about their product and their customers. Are they perfect? Absolutely not, are they good? Better than every single company out there that tries to be like them. Period.

      • john89@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        I’m glad people bring this up.

        Private companies are not intrinsically better than public ones, but at least they have the capacity to be.

        Valve is one of the very few examples of a company that sees the value in working with customers, not against them. This would be impossible if Valve were publicly-traded.

        • penquin@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Exactly. They’re (as far I know) the only company that emailed me to tell me that I can take to court directly without an arbitration. Not that I’ll ever be able to afford it, but seeing how confident and pro-consumer (I fucking hate the word consumer lol) they are is amazing.

    • Biorix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Because it’s open source and based on the Linux kernel. It’s owned by them but you can do what you want with it. You can’t with Windows.

      So if a game works on the Steam OS, it works on pretty much any distro

      I game with Steam on Linux, but I’m not using Steam OS

      Also, that means that every effort made by Valve to improve compatibility is beneficial to everyone.

      Edit: Also, even if it were closed source, I think it would still be good as it gives us alternatives to Windows. But

    • Tankton@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      The source is always free so you could fork it if you disagree with them. Also it means broader support for Linux gaming

  • Zink@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 hours ago

    This is so great to see, and the timing is perfect.

    My son already calls the PC Steam, as in “we played game A on Xbox and game B on Steam,” so maybe by the time he has a PC in his room Steam really will run the whole platform.

  • gramgan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I thought this had already happened?

    I remember seeing ads on Steam for SteamOS years ago—wasn’t there a point at which you could download and run it on your own computer? What happened?

    • Belgdore@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Old steam os was an Ubuntu derived OS. Ubuntu has issues relating to the organization that runs it. New steam os is basically a coat of paint on top of Arch which is community based. The old os is deprecated.

      The version on steam deck is fantastic, but they have been polishing it for desktop use for a while now. I can’t wait to have it available.

    • penquin@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      If I recall correctly, this has never happened the way it’s happening now. It was a matter of “hey, you can fork it on GitHub and make your own iso thing”, hence why there was a “holoiso” or something like that that (I keep forgetting the name) where people used if they wanted to install steamOS on a device. This one is straight supported by valve. Like “hey, here is our official steam OS that we use on our steam deck. Use it and we will support you”.

      • bodaciousFern@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Iirc the original steamOS was Debian based and you really had to be an experienced Linux user to use and enjoy it.

        With the new steamOS (arch based?) it’s a much more streamlined experience and opens up the user base because of it

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      From what I recall, it wasn’t something you could easily use like a normal distro, and that version was based on Debian (so stable but outdated software). It only worked on some hardware, and you had to do a full system wipe.

      More likely, this is them officially partnering with handheld or gaming laptop makers, using their latest Arch-based distro and allowing them to use Valve/Steam branding as a selling point.

    • jjagaimo@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I think modern steamos is based on a different distro then it was then. Also proton is good enough now to justify switching for a lot of people

  • korazail@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I jumped into Linux, via Mint, about a year ago when I refreshed my hardware. The transition was pretty easy, and I haven’t looked back. Steam runs fine and I haven’t had a modern game that didn’t work under default proton settings except for things I’ve run outside Steam and mods. Most of my personal PC’s workload is gaming and handful of web-based apps that are effectively OS-agnostic; Everything else has an easy equivalent in the apt repos.

    I would say that my decision to embrace Linux as my OS was primarily influenced by my Steam Deck. Gaming on it has been simple and the desktop UI was easy to adapt to. I replaced my laptop with the Steam Deck, bluetooth keyboard and mouse, and a USB-C dock with HDMI out (all things I already had for the laptop). I now just hook into whatever TV is handy as a monitor when I need a computer on the go.

    I was a tech enthusiast when I was younger, and am thus familiar with fucking around on the command line, but now I’m an old man who just wants his stuff to work and it just has… The barrier of entry for the Linux Desktop is effectively gone. We just need PR now.

    Also, I think I’d replace Mint on my primary PC with SteamOS, given a simple way to do so. About a year ago, the desktop/beta SteamOS was not fully baked.

  • argarath@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    This is the fifth person I see misinterpreting what Steve said about doing Linux performance testing, they aren’t going to start doing this soon, they will only start doing it WHEN SteamOS is released for desktops! It was very clear on the video FFS

    I’m also really fucking excited for that tho, I recently switched to mint and helldivers 2 actually feels smoother than on windows, it has been such a good experience!! I cannot imagine how much better things will get with more people jumping to Linux and thus game makers actually pay attention to us

      • argarath@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Thanks you! And sorry if I was too aggressive, reading it again it sounded way more aggressive than I expected, I just wanted to sound energetic instead, my bad

    • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I’ve been daily driving Linux since 2017, I started with Ubuntu and it’s been great. I recently got a Lenovo T14 Gen 1 and put Linux Mint 22 on it, and I’ve been playing some games on it and it’s been pretty nice for such a portable laptop.

    • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I’m excited, but I wish gpu manufacturers would jump on board with physically compatible cards with ffs or smaller form factor business machines. HP, Dell, et al like to limit space for traditional GPUs in those machines. If there was a half height mid/low grade gpu with components on the reverse side that would be a great couch gaming machine.

      • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        If I recall Intel’s GPUs are a little slimmer right? But I’ve heard middling results with compatibility and such.

        • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I have the sparkle brand intel low profile single slot in an hp sff PC and it barely fits and leaves about 3/8" space between the power supply. It has all the room in the world in the backside. One slot over is a 1x pcie slot if only hp had switched the two or the video card had straight through and out of the case cooling.

  • Patariki@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I just build a new gaming/creative pc, decided to make the jump to linux mint while i was setting up something new. And I honestly expected more hickups than i got, nothing which a quick search didn’t fix except for one. My xbox controller won’t connect over Bluetooth, it works when connected through a cable though. But I also noticed some stick drift, so I’m tossing it and order an 8bitdo which has those magentic sticks (forgot the name) and linux compatibility.

  • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Every game I bought on Steam under Windows runs great on Steam in Linux Mint. The few games I didn’t buy on Steam (Deus Ex, Giants: Citizen Kabuto) run great on Wine, using the default settings.

    Adopting Proton was the smartest thing Valve ever did. They’re going to get about 90% of gamers migrating from Windows to Linux, who don’t want to fiddle with configuration settings.

  • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    This could lead to some sort of controlling mechanism that will check if your OS is actually SteamOS, otherwise some kind of DRM would prevent you from playing online for example. I’m wary.

    Also people are forgetting that gaming isn’t the only thing people use their computers for. They are convenience devices. They want to game on the PC they also use for other things. They will not switch for gaming only. Companies who sell software will see this and start piling on their controlling mechanisms, tracking, … More proprietary things will come, I mean games already are, and they are not in the spirit of Linux.

    I’m bad at expressing my thoughts, but I hope you understand what I’m trying to say.

    • john89@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Not really. The “control mechanism” is already in place for games that rely on Steam’s infrastructure for their online functionality.

      • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Yes, but that’s not what i mean, i mean other non steam software. Software developers will follow wherever users will go. And they will bring their mechanisms to protect their proprietary software.

  • مهما طال الليل@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I never really gamed on PC except for Command and Conquer Red Alert and Age of Empires 2. I still got a Steam Deck and it replaced my PC and not just for gaming.

  • thisisbutaname@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I just did that. I have a dual boot laptop where Windows was used exclusively for games, and instead of upgrading that I built myself a PC with an AMD GPU (Nvidia, fuck you!).

    So far I haven’t run into any problem that I couldn’t easily solve, and the only games that won’t run are those demanding I install an anti cheat system, but I’m fine not playing those.