• az04@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Because in the long term, very high inflation leads to everyone being poorer. And Argentina is the very best example of this.

    A country that went from being the 6th richest in the world to having over half the population in poverty in 100 years. All thanks to protectionism, subsidized living costs, low taxes and printing money to make up the difference.

    And let’s not forget fleecing the international community for money to rebuild the economy several times and then not paying it back.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It’s gone from less than half of the population being in poverty to over 60% being in poverty since Milei has started implementing his austerity measures.

      So it sounds like exactly the opposite of what you’re claiming is happening.

      But it’s fine. People are starving but it’s okay because austerity somehow is always a good thing and fuck those people, they were going to starve anyway. Probably.

      • az04@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Lowering inflation when it’s too high is always a question of short term pain for some people to get long term benefits for most people.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Most people are in poverty. 60%. “You’ll do better in the long term” is not very accurate when people are starving to death.

          This is the most ridiculous attempt to defend something that is causing suffering on a scale of millions that I have seen in a long time.