What an utter piece of shit.

  • orclev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s basically a variant of eminent domain, but I suspect it would be a hard case to argue. Ukraine chose to use Starlink, and the US governments power to invoke eminent domain is based on the common good provided to the US public via the seized property. It’s arguable whether the US public would see much if any value from the US government running Starlink unless they’re going to start providing free service to US citizens. There’s also the problem that there are plenty of other options that don’t require seizing of property.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The US could just nationalise it. SpaceX is basically running on government money anyway, just fold it into NASA.

      • jarfil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        NASA is basically being forced by Congress to funnel SLS program money into select contractors against NASA’s own assessments. I don’t think you want any of their hands near SpaceX if you want it to stay operational.