Almost all the links in my front homepage are sponsored now. What’s next, a few ads in the bookmark bar? How about when I enter a URL, I then have to type “McDonald’s” before I can actually navigate there?

  • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I say let them cook a little, they arent drowning in donations and still do a tone of things for foss communities.

    Let’s remember that the de fuckto market (ie pleb) alternative is overwhelmingly Chrome.

    We dont need such projects just so we as individuals can have privacy focused experiences but also for how that influences markets and society. And to have any influence you need certain power of masses.

  • Redex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Personaly those shortcuts are a feature I literally never use so much so I don’t even register their existence anymore.

  • ColdWater@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    The browser itself is free, and they have to make money somehow to keep the company running (if the CEO didn’t keep most of it for themself). If you don’t like it, you can turn it off or download an ad-free fork.

      • Nonmi@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Name an internet browser that’s not rigged to show you adds, or one that doesn’t havest your data.

        • TotalCourage007@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Y’all can use LibreWolf or BestHomePageEver if it really bugs somebody. I do get being annoyed by shortcut ads though.

          • NudeNewt@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            17 hours ago

            I wouldn’t recommend LibreWolf to the average user as they’ll unfoubtedly stretch their attack surface thin.

              • NudeNewt@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                17 hours ago

                Absolutely, it’s just the browser extensions most end-users want/need that would cause them distress in that regard. It’s simply not as user friendly from what I can recall, it’s been a while since I last used it so it may have improved since then

      • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        How much money are they likely to make over a lifetime of a user from the sponsorships. Would FirefoxPro actually be a good idea?

      • ghen@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        18 hours ago

        There’s literally a settings button on that new tab page to take you right to the correct setting.

  • Aeri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Yeah but you can literally just turn this off with no fuss.

    1.Firefox for Android.

    2.Tap the menu button.

    3.Tap. Settings.

    4.Tap Homepage.

    5.Deselect Sponsored shortcuts under Shortcuts.

  • superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    19 hours ago

    If we want software to be FOSS we have to stop bitching so much about developers trying to make the math work.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      17 hours ago

      One could posit an ideal public sector development studio that takes grants from the state/federal government to produce useful Open Source software. Think public radio or public broadcasting, but for apps.

      Hell, it isn’t even wild in the current moment. Modern day AWS and Azure subsidize much of its small/new user client base with the massive public sector clientele. OpenAI and DeepSeek are both the product of giant state-sponsored initiatives to develop AI that is free at point of service. Plenty of the original internet architecture was the product of public investment and grants, as was the university-centric ARPNET that would eventually be commoditizated into the commercial World Wide Web.

      Look up the history of the National Center for Supercomputing Applications and the pioneering of Mosaic, the first widely available GUI-based web browser. It was the foundation for both Internet Explorer and Netscape Navigator, which licensed the original design for the tiniest fraction of what it would ultimately generate in future revenues.

  • a9cx34udP4ZZ0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    So how exactly were you planning on them making money if they don’t take money from Google to be the default search engine and they don’t take money to place advertisements on the default home page?

    • themusicman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Open source projects shouldn’t have “making money” on their priority list. I would donate to Mozilla if I had some guarantee that my money would actually fund Firefox development

        • themusicman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 hours ago

          I’m not one of those people, and to be clear I support for-profit companies open sourcing code. Mozilla is a unique case where donations are a tiny fraction of their income and Firefox development is a tiny fraction of their expenses. I just want to donate directly to the parts I care about (Firefox, MDN).

  • subtext@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    281
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    These can be turned off. Not great that they’re on by default, but you gotta pay the bills somehow right?

    • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      182
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, this is basically the least offensive thing possible that ensures the lights stay on.

      • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        84
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Remember when most sites had simple banner ads, and there was no widespread outcry about how much they sucked and we needed ad blocking software? Then they started flashing, then the popups and pop-unders came, then vids started autoplaying, and now here we are.

        If advertisers hadn’t gotten greedier than banners on the sides of sites, maybe no one would’ve gotten around to blocking all their shit.

      • Elgenzay@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        The only thing really offensive about it, judging from the post, is that they’re positioned before the user’s pins, not after.

    • Kushan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      People keep giving Mozilla shit for taking money from Google, yet they see an ad for a different company and lose their shit.