• blue_berry@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ok ok fine. I get it. I still think it would be cool. Maybe some time in the future when the Fediverse is further developed as a whole.

    • chrisA
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think it will be pretty much I possible to create an unbiased recommendation algorithm without creating echo chambers.

      • blue_berry@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Do you mean “impossible”?

        I think it doesn’t have to be. The crucial thing is that you have the option to simply change instances if you don’t like the algorithm that comes with it. The scholar Katharina Zweig introduced danger-levels of algorithms. The danger level is determined by A.) whether you can easily get an alternative for the given algorithm without investing too much and B.) which has low negative impact in case the algorithm is bad.

        She would categorizes curating-algorithms in social media therefore as low as long as there are enough alternatives that you can easily switch to and I would agree with that.

        Edit: The categorization was about algorithm-decision-systems but it can be applied for algorithms in general

        • chrisA
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I doubt you would find an algorithm per instance. The question is what kind of recommendations would like? What is the kind of content you want to push and how do you decide to push it. I am genuinely wondering because even when I used Twitter, I always used the chronological view so I’m wondering what you are missing.