ekZepp@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 month agoWhat Refutes Science...lemmy.worldimagemessage-square77fedilinkarrow-up11.32Karrow-down118
arrow-up11.3Karrow-down1imageWhat Refutes Science...lemmy.worldekZepp@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square77fedilink
minus-squarewill_a113@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up35·1 month agook, but what about three Youtube videos?
minus-squareMr Fish@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17·1 month agoAs long as they’re shorts, only showing one vague, unverifiable, third or fourth hand anecdote each.
minus-squareRemember_the_tooth@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·1 month agoThat makes sense. I heard that my college roommate’s pen pal said something like that.
minus-squareRemember_the_tooth@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 month agoAre they at least 3rd-hand, (or more) spurious sources with an inscrutable chain of custody, because if not, you can miss with that.
minus-squarewill_a113@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 month ago Are they at least 3rd-hand, (or more) spurious sources with an inscrutable chain of custody Is there any other kind?
minus-squareSlovene@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoMaybe, if they’re from potholer54
minus-squarePhoenixz@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 month agoAll hail potholer54! The guy is awesome
ok, but what about three Youtube videos?
As long as they’re shorts, only showing one vague, unverifiable, third or fourth hand anecdote each.
That makes sense. I heard that my college roommate’s pen pal said something like that.
Are they at least 3rd-hand, (or more) spurious sources with an inscrutable chain of custody, because if not, you can miss with that.
Is there any other kind?
Maybe, if they’re from potholer54
All hail potholer54! The guy is awesome