pseudo@jlai.lu to Confidently Incorrect@lemmy.world · 2 months agonuked from orbitmander.xyzimagemessage-square42linkfedilinkarrow-up1419arrow-down111cross-posted to: science_memes@mander.xyz
arrow-up1408arrow-down1imagenuked from orbitmander.xyzpseudo@jlai.lu to Confidently Incorrect@lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square42linkfedilinkcross-posted to: science_memes@mander.xyz
minus-squarenotsoshaihulud@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 months agohaha, awesome metric of bullshit:)
minus-squareilinamorato@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-22 months agoIt’s honestly kind of impressive. How does one publication manage to be so exactly wrong about that many topics?
minus-squarethrowback3090@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-22 months agoIt’s Forbes, it’s hypercapitalist. Those people you listed are actually successful from forbes’ pov. After all, they got rich and got out. (Caveats like Holmes et al, but also real stallar performance from silicon valley bank).
minus-squareilinamorato@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoSure, but they didn’t get away with it. That’s a key step for the late-stage capitalist; getting caught is like not sticking the landing.
haha, awesome metric of bullshit:)
It’s honestly kind of impressive. How does one publication manage to be so exactly wrong about that many topics?
It’s Forbes, it’s hypercapitalist. Those people you listed are actually successful from forbes’ pov. After all, they got rich and got out. (Caveats like Holmes et al, but also real stallar performance from silicon valley bank).
Sure, but they didn’t get away with it. That’s a key step for the late-stage capitalist; getting caught is like not sticking the landing.