Tea@programming.dev to Opensource@programming.devEnglish · 10 hours agoAlternativeOSS - Open Source Software Alternatives Directory.alternativeoss.comexternal-linkmessage-square10fedilinkarrow-up1108arrow-down10
arrow-up1108arrow-down1external-linkAlternativeOSS - Open Source Software Alternatives Directory.alternativeoss.comTea@programming.dev to Opensource@programming.devEnglish · 10 hours agomessage-square10fedilink
minus-squarehaverholm@kbin.earthlinkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down1·10 hours agoNice, although my first thought was “what was wrong with OSalt.com?” This site is definitely slicker, and more modern, though.
minus-squareObsidianZed@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 hour agoThis site seems way outdated, not just in terms of style. It suggests Chrome as an open source alternative to Firefox, but also that Firefox is an open source alternative to Internet Explorer 7.
minus-squareKualdir@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·9 hours agoMan clicking on that link was like getting a flashbang thrown in my face ;-; but good to have 2 sources!
minus-squareocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down4·4 hours ago?? Are you living in a cave or something
minus-squareKualdir@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·4 hours agoI use dark mode everything, white mode is exhausting on the eyes even with blue light filter glasses
minus-squareocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down5·4 hours agoCalling a white webpage a flashbang is a little silly. There’s preference then exaggeration
minus-squarehaverholm@kbin.earthlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down5·8 hours agoSorry! I didn’t anticipate that strong a reaction to a neutral-bordering-on-boring website 😨 I guess it hasn’t aged well. edit: Thought it was clear from context that I meant “a neutral-bordering-on-boring website design”, but apparently not.
minus-squareCreat@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up7·6 hours agoI think he was referring to the fact that the website has no dark mode, not anything related to content.
minus-squarehaverholm@kbin.earthlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down2·6 hours agoThat’s what I was referring to as well, but I see even that gets me downvoted around here 🙄 Some people need to chill out.
Nice, although my first thought was “what was wrong with OSalt.com?” This site is definitely slicker, and more modern, though.
This site seems way outdated, not just in terms of style. It suggests Chrome as an open source alternative to Firefox, but also that Firefox is an open source alternative to Internet Explorer 7.
Ouch
Man clicking on that link was like getting a flashbang thrown in my face ;-; but good to have 2 sources!
?? Are you living in a cave or something
I use dark mode everything, white mode is exhausting on the eyes even with blue light filter glasses
Calling a white webpage a flashbang is a little silly. There’s preference then exaggeration
Sorry! I didn’t anticipate that strong a reaction to a neutral-bordering-on-boring website 😨 I guess it hasn’t aged well.
edit: Thought it was clear from context that I meant “a neutral-bordering-on-boring website design”, but apparently not.
I think he was referring to the fact that the website has no dark mode, not anything related to content.
That’s what I was referring to as well, but I see even that gets me downvoted around here 🙄 Some people need to chill out.