• ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    The specific religious traditions matter though. The context and rules surrounding covering of girls and women are a more problematic matter. The same goes for other religious practices that are rooted in values that have no place in a secular and more or less egalitarian state.

    • LazyKoala@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      You have a very odd understanding of what “secular state” means. It doesn’t mean that the state can dictate where or how you’re allowed to express you religion. It doesn’t mean that some parts of religion are to be tolerated, where as those that you see as bad can be forbidden at will.

      All it means, is that the state institutions, can’t force you to partake in a religion or activities related to that religion. Kids who voluntarily want to express their religion are free to do so. Whether that kid is forced into following that religion, is not an issue of a “secular state”.

      • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It also means a certain collection of values. And having rules for girls and women that include them having to cover their hair and body “because religion” is going against those values.

        And yes, it absolutely does matter in a secular state whether people forcing their children into religious beliefs. At least in school the children should learn that these rules only exist in the minds of their parents or communities. Freedom also means to be free to choose. And grooming your children into religious practices is not freedom.