• OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    I didn’t say they weren’t doing fine or that they shouldn’t be doing what they’re doing.

    So your position is that their system is “Fascist Corporatism,” but also… that’s fine, actually?

    I just said that they’re not communists. This is not a bad thing! But lying about it is of course somewhat distasteful, especially for those people who think themselves as being communists.

    Whether they’re “lying” is a matter of interpretation and ideological differences. Like, if I’m a hardcore, traditionalist Roman Catholic, maybe from my perspective, all Protestants are “lying” about being Christian because “true Christianity” means my interpretation of it. Likewise, if you’re a hardcore Maoist, then maybe you’d argue that China is governed by revisionists who are “lying” about being communists.

    If we want to look at it from a relatively objective point of view, the largest number of self-identified communists in the world are Marxist-Leninists, who don’t view China as “lying about being communist” but rather agree with or at least critically support their approach. So, idk, if you want to join some fringe Christian sect that claims every other sect as being heretical and themselves as the sole defender of the faith, or if you want to join some fringe communist group that denounces every other communist group as revisionist and themselves as the only “real” communists, then idk, you do you ig. But not everyone who believes different things from you is “lying.”

    • vga@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      15 hours ago

      So your position is that their system is “Fascist Corporatism,” but also… that’s fine, actually?

      Great point. That was a mistake from my part. So what China is doing is indeed not fine at all, even though it kind of works for them.

      • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I’m sure that your branding of the Chinese economy is based on a very high degree of intellectual rigor and definitely not just pulling words out of your ass based on vibes.

        • vga@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Well, you managed to make an even less intellectual comment as a reply, so kudos for that achievement.

          • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 hours ago

            No, I didn’t.

            I already explained to you how China’s economy works based on actual facts. You completely ignored it and doubled down on vibes based nonsense that you didn’t even bother to defend or explain in any way. Telling you you’re wrong is not “less intellectual” than being blatantly wrong.

            • Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              29 minutes ago

              As a reader btw, I appreciate your point of view. Don’t get discouraged when your interlocutors put in less work than you. I think snuffing out the liberal fervor for capitalism by using examples where different systems are successful is vitally important. I’m just not very educated on it as I could be. People like you help with that!