• Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    I agree that it is necessary in the current world, just making it clear that this isn’t a fundamental issue with being a communist, it’s a matter of policy.

    Whether or not that policy makes sense right now is different, and I agree that it absolutely does in the current climate, but once there are more socialist countries, I think it’ll become a non-issue. Like I said, only authoritarian methods like controlling speech can allow socialists/communists to hold onto power in the world right now.

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Fair enough. I guess my central point is that the fact that the PRC’s model exists is not proof that a system that takes away tools like control of media can also exist. I would agree that eventually, when more Socialist countries exist and especially the US Empire crumbles, this may be able to weaken, but I would also say that this depends on internal development as well, ie the Bourgeoisie must no longer exist anywhere for control of their speech to no longer be relevant, and this is abolished through development, not simple decree.

      Really, it’s getting into the weeds and being nitpicky over theory, your comment was generally good, but I wanted to highlight that there are Material reasons for the PRC’s control of information.