"The amount we could export would not solve their egg shortage," says the head of the Finnish Poultry Association.

Summary

Finland has declined a U.S. request to export eggs amid a severe American shortage caused by bird flu.

The Finnish Poultry Association cited the lack of prior trade agreements and complex regulatory hurdles. Even if exports were possible, Finland’s limited egg production would not significantly impact the U.S. crisis.

Other European nations, including Sweden and Denmark, also face difficulties meeting U.S. demand, while Europe grapples with its own egg shortages.

The U.S. has turned to countries like Turkey and the Netherlands for supplies as bird flu remains a global issue.

  • Senal@programming.devEnglish
    6·
    15 hours ago

    I suspect more people than you think realise this is a potential outcome.

    Assuming it boils over before there is another election (also assuming that’s a thing that happens), military action is 100% a playable card.

    It’s a toddler with a nuclear tantrum button.

    It’s honestly not that much different in type then most nuclear powered nations.

    The difference is “absolute last resort, and only maybe then” vs “they won’t let me annex Greenland and are being mean to me”

    Hyperbolic ofc, but illustrative.

    What are the reasonable good alternatives though?

    • LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.eeEnglish
      31·
      8 hours ago

      Maybe, I’m mostly just worried that the western world is fueling nationalism with these tariff wars. The “good alternative” is understanding that the tariff’s are not a war between nations but a war on the working class. These tariff’s are paid by the working class. The good alternative is understanding that the working class of each of these countries SHOULD be fighting against the ruling classes of each nation. The ruling classes between nations being in “conflict” is a charade. No one in the ruling class cares of the consequences but only sees them as an opportunity to fuel nationalism and reactionary sentiment.

      So, while I will agree with anti America and anti imperialism. I just think that the “buy European” or “by Canadian” are missing the forest for the trees. The ruling class of Canada or Europe are not fighting a war against America. They are worsening the material conditions of their working class (in response to the Americans doing so) in order to maintain the profits of the ruling class of their nations.

      It is absolutely ignorant to think that Canada or Europe or any other capitalist nation is fighting for the interest of their working class. They are fighting for the interest of their ruling class and will use nationalism to justify the worsening conditions we all face.

      TLDR: This is not a war between nations but a war between class. (I know Marxist cliche but read it if you want more than that.)

      • Senal@programming.devEnglish
        1·
        8 minutes ago

        A worldwide revolution in which everyone unites against the “ruling class” isn’t a viable alternative in and of itself, that’s like saying “world peace”.

        An example of an alternative would be something which could fill in the blank in this sentence and make sense.

        “Don’t boycott products/companies, that isn’t how you achieve your goal, what you should be doing is <BLANK>”

        This is not a war between nations but a war between class

        The issue i have with this isn’t that it’s a marxist cliche (i’ll take your word on that, I’ve no idea) it’s that it presents a false dichotomy in which a class war and a national war can’t both be occurring at the same time.