• ayaya@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      That works for some apps but not anything that needs access to the filesystem and/or devices. Things like VSCode or mod managers, etc.

      • woelkchen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        That works for some apps but not anything that needs access to the filesystem and/or devices.

        Granting some application with a bundled ancient and insecure Electron build is insanity.

        Things like VSCode

        Luckily there are plenty of native source code editors out there, for example Kate.

        • ayaya@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Granting some application with a bundled ancient and insecure Electron build is insanity.

          Granting some application with a bundled ancient and insecure library of any kind is bad. That is not a problem exclusive to Electron it applies to static builds of any application ever made.

          Luckily there are plenty of native source code editors out there, for example Kate.

          Okay but that’s not the point. You said, “Just load the wrapped website in a browser.” Some apps won’t function like that. The fact that alternatives exist is irrelevant to what I replied to.

          • woelkchen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Okay but that’s not the point. You said, “Just load the wrapped website in a browser.”

            I replied to “it’s hard to do without them”. So yeah, opening wrapped websites in a browser for most Electron apps and using native alternatives for the rest is totally feasible and absolutely not beside the point.

            • ayaya@lemdro.id
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah, it’s feasible to do that. And? My point was that you can’t just rip out the web portion of an app and always expect it to work in a browser. That’s it. What you said is irrelevant in the sense that it has no effect on whether the web portion can run in a browser or not.

    • cley_faye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re aware that Electron app have access to much more stuff than what you can do in a browser? Like, important, functional stuff?

      Getting really tired of “this is just a website” approach. It’s starting to feel like /r/programmerhumor here.

      • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        just because electron apps have access to system features that browsers restrict access to for security reasons doesn’t mean they’re not websites in a trenchcoat

      • woelkchen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Are you aware that a huge chunk, most likely the vast majority, of Electron apps don’t use all that and are just wrapped web sites?

        • inge@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          a huge chunk, most likely the vast majority, of Electron apps […] are just wrapped web sites

          [citation needed]

            • BlueBockser@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              If the question was “how many repositories on GitHub mention the word electron”, your answer would be correct. As it stands, citation is still very much needed.

              • woelkchen@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                If the question was “how many repositories on GitHub mention the word electron”, your answer would be correct. As it stands, citation is still very much needed.

                That is a valid citation. You can count yourself how many of those repositories are just for wrapping specific websites by random people. If you think I’m wrong, put your money where your mouth is and provide a citation yourself.

                • BlueBockser@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  The cited source does not prove your point, so it is not a valid source. If you make a statement, you go prove it. Until you do, I’m gonna assume it to be false.

                  • woelkchen@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    The cited source does not prove your point, so it is not a valid source.

                    Your laziness to count repos is not my fault. 🤷

                    If you make a statement, you go prove it. Until you do, I’m gonna assume it to be false.

                    OK, then I’m continuing to assume your statements are false because you can’t even be bothered to provide a citation why mine is not valid. Bye then.