• nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Do we know if he bought the gun before or after the mental health problems were diagnosed?

    We don’t have many laws that will take the guns away after diagnosis, and worse, we seem to have a police force that’s not willing to enforce those laws when they do exist.

    • SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Even if he bought them before, involuntary commitment means Leos should be taking them…but as you just stated most LEOs don’t talk to each other or do what they need to be doing.

    • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think this is true: He had some from before and also bought a .308 sniper rifle after having mental issues. There’s a lot of info about this guy btw. He made threats to shoot up two different military national guard posts. He committed himself and asked for further treatment when he was being released. Oh, and I thought this was the typical veteran PTSD kind of issue. Actually no, he was trained but didn’t see combat. He was having some seriously mind-altering mental breakdowns. His guns were probably talking to him.