• Solar Bear@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        While that isn’t false, defaults carry immense weight. Also, very few have the means to host at scale like Docker Hub; if the goal is to not just repeat the same mistake later, each project would have to host their own, or perhaps band together into smaller groups. And unfortunately, being a good programmer does not make you good at devops or sysadmin work, so now we need to involve more people with those skillsets.

        To be clear, I’m totally in favor of this kind of fragmentation. I’m just also realistic about what it means.

        • dan@upvote.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Linuxserver.io images don’t come directly from Docker Hub any more, and I don’t know if anyone noticed or cared. They use their own domain lscr.io that redirects to the Docker repository they’re using (currently Github) which makes it easy for them to move the repository without breaking things for users. https://www.linuxserver.io/blog/wrap-up-warm-for-the-winter

          That approach is a good idea in general. If you’re running a medium to large size project, never directly rely on domain names you don’t control because it makes it painful to migrate to something else in the future. Even if your own domain just has a bunch of redirects (both URL redirects and email forwarding), it’s better than nothing.

        • fristislurper@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Bullshit. I can use docker without the docker hub very easily. Anyone can host docker images, and docker allows this, no weird hacks needed.

        • dan@upvote.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          They don’t though? The file formats are documented and other office suite software can read and write them.

            • dan@upvote.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              I agree that they’re a mess, but there’s nothing in there that intentionally holds you hostage. The format is not binary - it’s readable to anyone that wants to read it.

              non-standard implementations

              Do you have an example?

    • azdle@news.idlestate.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      That’s not really possible with docker TBH, and I say that as a diehard Podman advocate. Docker, the tooling that you install with your package manager, is open source. Sure they have windows and mac desktop stuff that isn’t open, but it’s not like you’re self-hosting with that, right?

      Plus there’s always Podman to switch to, which can be a (mostly) drop-in replacement, if you want something with a more trustworthy provenience.