How do people feel about donating to keep things running smoothly and making sure there are adequate resources and compensation for those involved in running .world instance?

I’m curious as I think this kind of rapid growth will be the first time the model is really being tested - as in, large rapid growth in users and activity resulting in sudden higher running costs.

I feel transparent engagement would be good to understand what the current costs are, how that scales and how people involved in keeping things running are fairly compensated for their time and effort.

Also having an issue tracker, roapmap etc public and real engagement let people see who and what they are investing in.

It’s an awesome job to see the server still standing after such a huge influx!

  • kiddblur@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I agree that it’s needed, and I plan on supporting my instance (although as of right now he has made it sound like there’s plenty of donations coming in), but I’m skeptical that the average person will chip in. I couldn’t even get my family to chip in on our shared {streaming service} subscription before they got kicked off it for not being in my household.

    • Gray@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh yeah, this will undoubtedly end up being a fraction of us. As long as it pays the bills it’s enough. I’m sure the admins will sound the alarms if they’re falling short on funding needs.