No, it’s because no 3rd party is able to gain even the slightest interest among the wider electorate. They are called “fringe” candidates for a reason.
Perot in '92 was the most successful, didn’t even hit 20% and won 0 states.
So, again, your choices are one candidate who admits to wanting to burn everything down, and one who doesn’t.
This is because people like you keep voting blue every time regardless of how bad they are.
If all the people who voted lesser would vote 3rd party the outcome might be different.
Right now you are ensuring nothing will change.
No, it’s because no 3rd party is able to gain even the slightest interest among the wider electorate. They are called “fringe” candidates for a reason.
Perot in '92 was the most successful, didn’t even hit 20% and won 0 states.
So, again, your choices are one candidate who admits to wanting to burn everything down, and one who doesn’t.
The choice is easy.