The paper doesn’t even prove that they are healthier due to a greater sense of personal responsibility. It only theorizes this sense of personal responsibility is a possible cause. As others have pointed out the study results could be explained simply by picking conservatives that are upperclass and have more time/energy/money to spend on being healthy.
No worries. The music contents were so appalling that I had to remove it to be sure it didn’t violate Rule 2 even if the actual video context was a critique.
Super easy. I had a post-op infection that prescription antibiotics cleared up np.
Don’t consider it easily reversible. The doctors made it clear there’s no guarantee
It’s not even that they “can’t” fund their own cleanup. The put down a cleaning deposit before operations begin and just walk away when the cleanup costs more than they originally put down.
I’d say they give the finger while walking but they need their hands to count their profits
This is all a blatant attempt to rile up the Right. They know this BS is unconstitutional and start the crap just in time for the inevitable court cases to strike then down around voting time. It’s all about getting that outrage boiling
Thank you. This should have been a top comment as it needs more direct attention.
Way to contribute to the conversation there champ. Here’s your sign.
Pepperidge Farms remembers
The problem is escalation. You fire your shots in self defence, they back off an extra 50’ and call in a “shots fired, officer needs assistance” call and suddenly 4 APCs, 20 cruisers and 2 helicopters are surrounding you. Cue sounds of 50 cal freedom suppressors being fired. And because you shot at them even though by the time its all over your body looks like a pile of spaghetti the shooting will be justified with barely a hearing involved.
Because selling a few observation drones during the off years is more than made up for by bombing Iranian terrorist leaders and damage to Shahed production facilities (the far more dangerous 3rd party contribution).
The lesser of 2 evils…
Really, what does terrorist have to do with indiscriminate murder…? You don’t know? Really? REALLY? Israel has been putting up with indiscriminate murder of their innocent women and children for a century now and they’ve had enough.
My guess is this whole shitshow will continue until your side finally says 'hey you know what Terrorism is a lose lose proposition and we should probably stop with this fanatical BS before we watch every one of our loved ones perish because Israel has had enough of our shit".
Surrender, release the hostages, negotiate like civilized people to come to an agreement where both sides acknowledge there is residual pain but are willing to set it aside in the interest of a lasting peace that respects both sides. Or, keep on Jihading until the problem solves itself. Your call.
Hamas released the hostages yet?
I would absolutely love it. Used to be an FLO and all I can say is carrying a stack of HE Shells would be stress free. Nobody rushing you or even being remotely discourteous. A team of escorts tackling anyone that even looks in the direction of my path, let alone attempts to walk in the way…
Thank you for making my job a little easier today :)
I actually read the referenced articles.
Fact: WWII was almost 8 decades ago. Japan, France, Italy, Brazil all are not Nazis.
Every nation has an element of Far-Right wackadoodles in their midst. To call Ukrainians nazis is as racist as calling Poles communists because they were a part of the USSR 40 years ago.
What evidence? I see zero reference to any evidence other than the word in the title. Nonsense. Reading the NYT article (which should have been the actual article not this blog post BS) the closest you get to anything Western related for breaking the negotiations is their advice that the initial tentative agreements ‘were tantamount to capitulation’. Negotiations proceeded long after that point and 2 key issues with them are attributed to their breakdown:
Putin’s micromanaging of his negotiation team led the Ukranian side to doubt the negotiations were anything but a stall tactic, and
A deal-breaking Russian amendment to Ukraine’s Article 5-esque ‘guarantors will come to the aid of Ukraine if they are attacked again in the future’ which essentially gave Russia a veto.
;tldr the only evidence provided by this blog post BS is for Russia not negotiating in good faith, and definitively being the one that spoiled the talks with a garbage ally defence veto amendment which strongly indicated they had every intention of doing all this again anyways no matter what the agreement said (their SOP.
For anyone wondering, this sort of blatant Russian propaganda is evaluated using a higher level of scrutiny but will be tolerated so long as the content can be reasonably interpreted as not intending to incite or belittle Ukrainians.
In this specific example, the claim ‘an Ukrainian assault by untrained and inexperienced prisoners was annihilated with ease’ would be in violation if it wasn’t so absurd, unsupported by the footage, and laughable.
Why allow it? Ukrainian ideals include things like ‘freedom of the press/information’. In times of war this has significant limitations ofc but I for one am interested in hearing ‘their side’ of events as they happen so long as it is done in a neutral voice. Many truths can be gleaned from lies for people savvy enough to read between the lines.
Rest assured this is not an open invitation for Russian bots to start spamming propaganda. This community will NOT become a Tankie Hellhole.
deleted by creator