Telegram was never safe. All anyone ever had was their word that some chats are end-to-end encrypted.
Telegram was never safe. All anyone ever had was their word that some chats are end-to-end encrypted.
Die haben halt die Prohibitionspropaganda richtig verinnerlicht.
Der schlimmste Feind im eignen Land…
Natürlich ist das aktuelle Gesetz besser als nix. Aber das ist halt echt kein hoher Anspruch. Eigenanbau ist halt nicht für alle praktikabel und kontrollierter Verkauf aus lizenzierten Geschäften würde deutlich mehr Menschen legalen Zugang ermöglichen.
Um den Schwarzmarkt auch nur zu gefährden hätte es eine deutlich entschlossenere Gesetzgebung gebraucht. Selbst das kanadische Modell hat das nicht vollständig geschafft.
Alkoholismus, musst du wissen, hat in Deutschland Tradition. Das ist Leitkultur! Die Suffköppe am Bahnhof sind also aufrechte deutsche Staatsbürger die sich gut ins Stadtbild einfügen.
/s
Really simple. Just ask it to point out the error. Also maybe tell it how the code is wrong. And then hope that the new code didn’t introduce new errors in formerly working sections. And that it understood what you meant. In a language that is inherently vague.
Flohmarkt? Seems simple enough.
Yes.
There used to be a service where you set an amount you paid each month and you could then mark pages/services for donation. At the end of the month your money would be split between all the pages/services you marked.
It was called flattr.
The elegance of this system is that you can set aside an amount of money you’re comfortable spending on art, or whatever you wanna categorise it as. So you’re fully in control of your spending. If videos/songs/articles/things cost a flat amount it’s easy to lose track of the total.
Here’s the complete list of ads I find acceptable:
That is for any and all media.
Almost like ecosystems make sense 🤔
In an attempt to weasel out of the liability for the woman’s death Disney’s lawyers pulled out the forced arbitration clause of the widower’s Disney+ subscription.
Meaning they’re effectively arguing that because he gives them money to use their service they should be allowed to get away with murder or at least criminal negligence.
I don’t think they’ve realised yet, what a foot-gun this argument is. On top of the obvious moral issues with this line of argument. I mean, this has “give us your firstborn” vibes.
It’s honestly disgusting.
USA says “jump” and every country goes “Yes, daddy. How high, daddy?”
Ugh, Realität macht immer so schlechte Laune. Aber danke.
TL;DW?
The ActivationPolicy
I added in an attempt to replicate what wg-quick
produces, as I recall.
Do you notice anything wrong with my config? https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/30495
Do you notice anything wrong with my config? https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/30495
My point. We don’t have code so we have to trust them blindly.