And some of those citations and quotes will be completely false and randomly generated, but they will sound very believable, so you don’t know truth from random fiction until you check every single one of them. At which point you should ask yourself why did you add unneccessary step of burning small portion of the rainforest to ask random word generator for stuff, when you could not do that and look for sources directly, saving that much time and energy

I like how in your quest for moral absolutism you came full circle and found the basis for absolute immortality.

No, that would be bad. But if that retirement stealer continues to steal, and the law doesn’t do anything, and the whole system is made so he will never get any consequences, there could be a moment when shooting him in the back is the only moral decision

Nah, you don’t get to claim “I didn’t mean it it was a joke” when people disagree with your opinion

Said the guy that “doesn’t support a murderer” no matter what.

I think they can just move it as a judgement as a matter of law, or whatever else rule applies. It was a pretty clear case afterall

But now all of the internet got incorporated into a magic 8-ball and when it gives you it’s random bullshit, you don’t know is it quoting anon from 4chan or a scientific paper or a journal or random assortment of words. And you don’t have any way to check it in confines of the system

Thd fuck do you mean without telling? I am very explicitly telling you that I don’t use them, and I’m very openly telling you that you also shouldn’t

I somehow know when it’s going to be accurate

Are you familiar with Dunning-Kruger?

No it doesn’t. It incorporates unknown number of words from the internet into a machine which only purpose is to sound like a human. It’s an insanely complicated machine, but the truthfulness of the response not only never considered, but also is impossible to take as a deaired result.
And the fact that so many people aren’t equipped to recognise it behind the way it talks could be buffling, but also very consistent with other choices humanity takes regularly.

Everyone knew that you don’t go to 4chan for information or knowledge

You are spending more time and effort doing that than you would googling old fashioned way. And if you don’t check, you might as well throwing magic 8-ball, less damage to the environment, same accuracy

Not LLM, that’s for sure

Damn, if you call this constant, I’m scared to guess what do you mean by fluctuating https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Hourly-production-and-hourly-average-wind-speed-mast-and-MERRA-for-an-exemplary-month_fig1_276421124

The thing about nukes, they don’t work by themselves. There needs to be a delivery system, and that’s basically a discount space industry, there should be the whole detection-response infrastructure. And if that’s on the table, I’m pretty sure Ukraine will be better off recieving all that in money, conventional arms, and troops.

He embraced the alt-right grift, and now he sits around with his cryptonazi friends, ranting about how women in movies are bad actually, women in videogames is even worse, everything is woke and whatever bullshit they are outraged about this moment

Well yeah, but as we recognise that DPRK isn’t a democratic republic, we can recognise that authoritarian cleptocracy remains that even if they call themselves socialists. It’s the actions thqt matter

I’m pretty sure you use the word leftist wrong

Well, that could change of if we as a society decide to define you as some characteristic you posess.

Yep